Decoupling or business as usual? How Japanese multinational corporations adapt to political risk in China

Abstract How are multinational firms (MNCs) and the global supply chains that link them to China adjusting to heightened political risks? Since the US–China Trade War, COVID-19 supply chain shocks, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Western governments have increased efforts to encourage MNCs to divert investment from an increasingly authoritarian China toward politically reliable allies and partners. Using firm-level data on Japanese MNCs from 2012–22, we examine competing predictions from “business as usual” and “follow the flag” theories. We introduce a typology of de-risking strategies: decoupling (exit from China), diversifying (investment outside China), and diverting (both exit from China and investment in friendly countries), contrasted with inaction. While most Japanese MNCs continue to operate in China, a majority have adopted at least one de-risking strategy over the past decade. Consistent with the “following the flag” theory, we find that national security-relevant MNCs are significantly more likely to engage in all de-risking strategies after controlling for firm size, experience, and China exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcaf015
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoupling or business as usual? How Japanese multinational corporations adapt to political risk in China

Jiakun Jack Zhang, Samantha A. Vortherms, Timothy Cichanowicz
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Decoupling or business as usual? How Japanese multinational corporations adapt to political risk in China

Jiakun Jack Zhang, Samantha A. Vortherms, Timothy Cichanowicz
article en

Abstract

Abstract How are multinational firms (MNCs) and the global supply chains that link them to China adjusting to heightened political risks? Since the US–China Trade War, COVID-19 supply chain shocks, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Western governments have increased efforts to encourage MNCs to divert investment from an increasingly authoritarian China toward politically reliable allies and partners. Using firm-level data on Japanese MNCs from 2012–22, we examine competing predictions from “business as usual” and “follow the flag” theories. We introduce a typology of de-risking strategies: decoupling (exit from China), diversifying (investment outside China), and diverting (both exit from China and investment in friendly countries), contrasted with inaction. While most Japanese MNCs continue to operate in China, a majority have adopted at least one de-risking strategy over the past decade. Consistent with the “following the flag” theory, we find that national security-relevant MNCs are significantly more likely to engage in all de-risking strategies after controlling for firm size, experience, and China exposure.

International Relations of the Asia-PacificVol. 26(1)
University of Kansas (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Irvine University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.