A Buckingham-Pi dimensionless analysis for melt pool stability and defect prediction in additive manufacturing

Melt pool instabilities limit the reliability of additive manufacturing. Here, we demonstrate that a minimal Buckingham-π framework, supplemented by a normalized enthalpy (NE) metric, consolidates process outcomes across heat source settings (power, speed, spot) and material properties. IN738LC was processed on an EOS M290; single-track and bulk responses, melt pool geometric features, part relative density (ρ∗), and areal roughness parameters Sa and Sz, were quantified and subsequently mapped onto compact NE-dimensionless number spaces after the normalized-enthalpy metric had been calibrated using an effective absorptivity inferred from the measured melt pool depth. The recoil number cleanly delineates modes: Recoil≲2 (conduction→stable keyhole) maintains ρ∗≳99% with low Sa, whereas Recoil≳4–5 marks an unstable keyhole with spatter and porosity. Within this map, favorable transport balances are Re≲100, We<1, small Ca and not-too-small Oh, and Fo>0.1; external convection remains negligible (Nu≪1). Rather than VED, we advocate working directly in Π-space (NE,Recoil,Re,We,Ca,Oh,Fo,Nu)—to define, compare, and transfer qualifiable process windows across machines and alloys.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Additive Manufacturing Letters
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2026.100366
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Buckingham-Pi dimensionless analysis for melt pool stability and defect prediction in additive manufacturing

Rahmi Ünal, Metin U. Salamcı, Mahdi Alishavandi
Additive Manufacturing Letters
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

A Buckingham-Pi dimensionless analysis for melt pool stability and defect prediction in additive manufacturing

Rahmi Ünal, Metin U. Salamcı, Mahdi Alishavandi
article en

Abstract

Melt pool instabilities limit the reliability of additive manufacturing. Here, we demonstrate that a minimal Buckingham-π framework, supplemented by a normalized enthalpy (NE) metric, consolidates process outcomes across heat source settings (power, speed, spot) and material properties. IN738LC was processed on an EOS M290; single-track and bulk responses, melt pool geometric features, part relative density (ρ∗), and areal roughness parameters Sa and Sz, were quantified and subsequently mapped onto compact NE-dimensionless number spaces after the normalized-enthalpy metric had been calibrated using an effective absorptivity inferred from the measured melt pool depth. The recoil number cleanly delineates modes: Recoil≲2 (conduction→stable keyhole) maintains ρ∗≳99% with low Sa, whereas Recoil≳4–5 marks an unstable keyhole with spatter and porosity. Within this map, favorable transport balances are Re≲100, We<1, small Ca and not-too-small Oh, and Fo>0.1; external convection remains negligible (Nu≪1). Rather than VED, we advocate working directly in Π-space (NE,Recoil,Re,We,Ca,Oh,Fo,Nu)—to define, compare, and transfer qualifiable process windows across machines and alloys.

Additive Manufacturing LettersVol. 17
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Buckingham-Pi dimensionless analysis for melt pool stability and defect prediction in additive manufacturing — Rahmi Ünal, Metin U. Salamcı, et al. · Additive Manufacturing Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS