Do You Study What You Eat? Comparing South African Aquatic Food Production Statistics With Research

ABSTRACT In many countries, foods from aquatic sources provide an important source of protein and key micronutrients. However, aquatic food systems can be impacted by hazards, which drive inefficiencies. Such inefficiencies have consequences for the environmental, economic and social sustainability of food. When directing hazard management resources, it is critical to understand which components of the food system are of most importance to producers, consumers and other interested parties along the value chain. In this paper, we use South Africa as a case study in characterising the aquatic food system. To do this, we created a framework combining production and consumption statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations with research from global search engines and an in‐country publication database. Using this framework, we found that South Africa's aquatic food system is dominated by pelagic and demersal finfish fisheries, such as those for Southern African anchovy ( Engraulis capensis ) and Cape hakes ( Merluccius spp). Aquaculture in South Africa predominantly consists of non‐cephalopod molluscs, freshwater fish and some aquatic plants. Although these groups account for approximately 3% of aquatic production in South Africa, they were the focus of over 60% of research from global search engines. In contrast, research from the in‐country database focused on finfish fisheries, which contribute 60 times more production volume compared to aquaculture. Therefore, while statistics from the FAO gave a good first overview of the aquatic food system in South Africa, in‐country research was invaluable in gaining a holistic understanding of the food system. When applied across the network of food sectors in a country, the approach outlined here, combining production, consumption and research values, provides a framework for practitioners requiring a nuanced overview of a country's food systems, as well as highlighting investment, knowledge and data gaps to target future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquaculture Fish and Fisheries
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.70160
Primary Topic
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do You Study What You Eat? Comparing South African Aquatic Food Production Statistics With Research

Sarah R. Alewijnse, Kevin W. Christison, Jessica Witt, Elisa Capuzzo
Aquaculture Fish and Fisheries
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
article

Do You Study What You Eat? Comparing South African Aquatic Food Production Statistics With Research

Sarah R. Alewijnse, Kevin W. Christison, Jessica Witt, Elisa Capuzzo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In many countries, foods from aquatic sources provide an important source of protein and key micronutrients. However, aquatic food systems can be impacted by hazards, which drive inefficiencies. Such inefficiencies have consequences for the environmental, economic and social sustainability of food. When directing hazard management resources, it is critical to understand which components of the food system are of most importance to producers, consumers and other interested parties along the value chain. In this paper, we use South Africa as a case study in characterising the aquatic food system. To do this, we created a framework combining production and consumption statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations with research from global search engines and an in‐country publication database. Using this framework, we found that South Africa's aquatic food system is dominated by pelagic and demersal finfish fisheries, such as those for Southern African anchovy ( Engraulis capensis ) and Cape hakes ( Merluccius spp). Aquaculture in South Africa predominantly consists of non‐cephalopod molluscs, freshwater fish and some aquatic plants. Although these groups account for approximately 3% of aquatic production in South Africa, they were the focus of over 60% of research from global search engines. In contrast, research from the in‐country database focused on finfish fisheries, which contribute 60 times more production volume compared to aquaculture. Therefore, while statistics from the FAO gave a good first overview of the aquatic food system in South Africa, in‐country research was invaluable in gaining a holistic understanding of the food system. When applied across the network of food sectors in a country, the approach outlined here, combining production, consumption and research values, provides a framework for practitioners requiring a nuanced overview of a country's food systems, as well as highlighting investment, knowledge and data gaps to target future research.

Aquaculture Fish and FisheriesVol. 6(1)
Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (ZA), Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB)
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.