Breast cancer staging for patients with “low‐risk” disease: Are they all the same?

Prognostic stage significantly influences survival among patients with low RS. RS < 11 alone should not automatically downstage patients to PPS IA; anatomic and other nongenomic factors remain important for prognosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70305
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast cancer staging for patients with “low‐risk” disease: Are they all the same?

Ellery Reason, Kelly Westbrook, Maggie Lee DiNome, Hannah E. Woriax et al.
Cancer
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Breast cancer staging for patients with “low‐risk” disease: Are they all the same?

Ellery Reason, Kelly Westbrook, Maggie Lee DiNome, Hannah E. Woriax, Akiko Chiba, Astrid Botty Van den Bruele, Kendra J. Modell Parrish, Tori C Nierenberg, Samantha M. Thomas, E. Shelley Hwang, Jennifer K. Plichta
article en

Abstract

Prognostic stage significantly influences survival among patients with low RS. RS < 11 alone should not automatically downstage patients to PPS IA; anatomic and other nongenomic factors remain important for prognosis.

CancerVol. 132(4)
Duke University (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Duke University Hospital (US), Duke Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.