Performance of Kinetic Models on Prediction of Biogas From Food Waste With/Without Pretreatment

ABSTRACT This study assesses the performance of different kinetic models for predicting biogas yield from anaerobic digestion (AD) and co‐digestion of food wastes (FWs) with/without garden waste under different pretreatment scenarios (thermal, extrusion, and sequential). Results show that cone and hydrolysis constant increase, whereas lag phase decrease in pretreated FW, indicating enhanced hydrolysis and faster biodegradability exhibiting better performance. On other hand, MFW/MFGW shows opposite trend due to its complex nature. Modified logistic showed better performance in all samples and CM in MFW/MFGW. Despite its better performance, superimposed exhibited inaccuracy in biogas yield. In conclusion, kinetic models enhance understanding the performance of AD of samples studied under various pretreated conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.70176
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Kinetic Models on Prediction of Biogas From Food Waste With/Without Pretreatment

Cherukuri Nithin Raja, Manju Asokkumar, Purushothaman Parthasarathy
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Performance of Kinetic Models on Prediction of Biogas From Food Waste With/Without Pretreatment

Cherukuri Nithin Raja, Manju Asokkumar, Purushothaman Parthasarathy
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study assesses the performance of different kinetic models for predicting biogas yield from anaerobic digestion (AD) and co‐digestion of food wastes (FWs) with/without garden waste under different pretreatment scenarios (thermal, extrusion, and sequential). Results show that cone and hydrolysis constant increase, whereas lag phase decrease in pretreated FW, indicating enhanced hydrolysis and faster biodegradability exhibiting better performance. On other hand, MFW/MFGW shows opposite trend due to its complex nature. Modified logistic showed better performance in all samples and CM in MFW/MFGW. Despite its better performance, superimposed exhibited inaccuracy in biogas yield. In conclusion, kinetic models enhance understanding the performance of AD of samples studied under various pretreated conditions.

Chemical Engineering & TechnologyVol. 49(2)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance of Kinetic Models on Prediction of Biogas From Food Waste With/Without Pretreatment — Cherukuri Nithin Raja, Manju Asokkumar, et al. · Chemical Engineering & Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS