Critical success factors in research data repository consortia: a lifecycle perspective with evidence from China

Purpose Research data repository (RDR) consortia are pivotal to improving the efficiency of scientific data sharing. However, the factors that determine their success across different life cycle stages remain underexplored. This study aims to identify and prioritize the critical success factors (CSFs) affecting RDR consortia in China from a life cycle perspective. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods approach was adopted to examine CSFs across the planning, implementation and sustainability stages. Semi-structured interviews with eight domain experts from China were conducted to generate CSFs, which were subsequently weighted through an analytical hierarchy process survey involving 112 stakeholders. Findings The results identify 21 factors influence RDR consortia success. Reflecting China’s top-down context, governance-related factors and researcher engagement dominate the planning stage. During implementation, legal and standardization mechanisms are most critical. In the sustainability stage, adaptive governance and benefit-sharing mechanisms are crucial for ensuring long-term resilience and responsiveness. Originality/value This study offers a life cycle-based framework that integrates legal, technical and governance factors across stages, providing actionable insights for academic libraries, policymakers and consortia managers, particularly in nations with similar top-down data strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Electronic Library
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/el-06-2025-0222
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical success factors in research data repository consortia: a lifecycle perspective with evidence from China

Xuanning Chen, Yi He
The Electronic Library
Research Data Management Practices
article

Critical success factors in research data repository consortia: a lifecycle perspective with evidence from China

Xuanning Chen, Yi He
article en

Abstract

Purpose Research data repository (RDR) consortia are pivotal to improving the efficiency of scientific data sharing. However, the factors that determine their success across different life cycle stages remain underexplored. This study aims to identify and prioritize the critical success factors (CSFs) affecting RDR consortia in China from a life cycle perspective. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods approach was adopted to examine CSFs across the planning, implementation and sustainability stages. Semi-structured interviews with eight domain experts from China were conducted to generate CSFs, which were subsequently weighted through an analytical hierarchy process survey involving 112 stakeholders. Findings The results identify 21 factors influence RDR consortia success. Reflecting China’s top-down context, governance-related factors and researcher engagement dominate the planning stage. During implementation, legal and standardization mechanisms are most critical. In the sustainability stage, adaptive governance and benefit-sharing mechanisms are crucial for ensuring long-term resilience and responsiveness. Originality/value This study offers a life cycle-based framework that integrates legal, technical and governance factors across stages, providing actionable insights for academic libraries, policymakers and consortia managers, particularly in nations with similar top-down data strategies.

The Electronic Library
University of Cambridge (GB), Cambridge School (PT), Southeast University (BD), Bridge University (SS), Southeast University (CN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.