Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient‐Experienced Continuity of Care Questionnaire (PECQ) Using Rasch Model

Patients were actively involved in the study by participating in the cognitive validation of the questionnaire items. Their contributions helped ensure that the content was understandable, relevant and appropriately tailored to the target population. By providing feedback on the wording and content, the patients contributed to the development of a user-friendly and contextually grounded instrument, which was subsequently validated in this study using the Rasch model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70559
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient‐Experienced Continuity of Care Questionnaire (PECQ) Using Rasch Model

Cecilia Fagerström, Linda Ljungholm, Ingrid Djukanović, Kristofer Årestedt
Health Expectations
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient‐Experienced Continuity of Care Questionnaire (PECQ) Using Rasch Model

Cecilia Fagerström, Linda Ljungholm, Ingrid Djukanović, Kristofer Årestedt
article en

Abstract

Patients were actively involved in the study by participating in the cognitive validation of the questionnaire items. Their contributions helped ensure that the content was understandable, relevant and appropriately tailored to the target population. By providing feedback on the wording and content, the patients contributed to the development of a user-friendly and contextually grounded instrument, which was subsequently validated in this study using the Rasch model.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(1)
Linnaeus University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Landstinget i Kalmar län (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.