Comparison of retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants using different isolation techniques

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the retention performance of filled and unfilled fluoride-containing resin-based fissure sealants applied to permanent first molars of children, and to assess the effect of rubber dam and cotton roll isolation techniques over an 18-month period. A total of 100 children/200 teeth participated in the study. The study was designed as a randomized, single-blinded, split-mouth trial. Mandibular permanent first molars of each patient divided into two groups: a-highly-filled pit-and-fissure sealant (Fissurit FX, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) and a-non-filled pit-and-fissure sealant (Teethmate F-1, Kuraray, Okayama, Japan), both containing fluoride. Considering the method of isolation of the dry working field, each group was further divided into two subgroups: rubber dam isolation and cotton roll isolation. The retention of the sealing material was analyzed at 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome of the study was sealant retention, while the presence of caries lesions was recorded as a secondary outcome. The data were statistically analyzed at a significance level of 0.05. At the 18-month follow-up, the complete retention rates were 76.4% for Teethmate F1 (80.0% with cotton-roll isolation, 73.0% with rubberdam isolation), and 58.3% for Fissurit FX (59.5% with cotton-roll isolation, 57.7% with rubberdam isolation), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the effect of isolation methods on the retention of materials. No caries lesion was detected among all the teeth being followed up after 18 months. Within the limitations of this study, sealant retention was more strongly influenced by filler content than by the isolation method used, with unfilled fluoride-containing sealants showing superior long-term retention. Both sealant types provided effective caries prevention over the 18-month follow-up period. Both fluoride-containing filled, and non-filled pit-and-fissure sealants demonstrated comparable retention and caries-preventive effects over 18 months, regardless of the isolation method, supporting their flexible use in clinical practice.The study was registered at CliniccalTrials.gov (Registration number: NCT07110701; Date of registration: 07 August 2025).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40093-6
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants using different isolation techniques

Ebru Kucukyilmaz, Tuğba Özdemir, Merve Nur Çelik, Selcuk Savas
Scientific Reports
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Comparison of retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants using different isolation techniques

Ebru Kucukyilmaz, Tuğba Özdemir, Merve Nur Çelik, Selcuk Savas
article en

Abstract

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the retention performance of filled and unfilled fluoride-containing resin-based fissure sealants applied to permanent first molars of children, and to assess the effect of rubber dam and cotton roll isolation techniques over an 18-month period. A total of 100 children/200 teeth participated in the study. The study was designed as a randomized, single-blinded, split-mouth trial. Mandibular permanent first molars of each patient divided into two groups: a-highly-filled pit-and-fissure sealant (Fissurit FX, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) and a-non-filled pit-and-fissure sealant (Teethmate F-1, Kuraray, Okayama, Japan), both containing fluoride. Considering the method of isolation of the dry working field, each group was further divided into two subgroups: rubber dam isolation and cotton roll isolation. The retention of the sealing material was analyzed at 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome of the study was sealant retention, while the presence of caries lesions was recorded as a secondary outcome. The data were statistically analyzed at a significance level of 0.05. At the 18-month follow-up, the complete retention rates were 76.4% for Teethmate F1 (80.0% with cotton-roll isolation, 73.0% with rubberdam isolation), and 58.3% for Fissurit FX (59.5% with cotton-roll isolation, 57.7% with rubberdam isolation), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the effect of isolation methods on the retention of materials. No caries lesion was detected among all the teeth being followed up after 18 months. Within the limitations of this study, sealant retention was more strongly influenced by filler content than by the isolation method used, with unfilled fluoride-containing sealants showing superior long-term retention. Both sealant types provided effective caries prevention over the 18-month follow-up period. Both fluoride-containing filled, and non-filled pit-and-fissure sealants demonstrated comparable retention and caries-preventive effects over 18 months, regardless of the isolation method, supporting their flexible use in clinical practice.The study was registered at CliniccalTrials.gov (Registration number: NCT07110701; Date of registration: 07 August 2025).

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.