The evolving landscape of bench-to-bedside translation in the era of neoadjuvant platforms: perspectives and opportunities

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as a crucial treatment paradigm for locally advanced and early-stage breast cancer, offering clinical benefits beyond tumor downstaging. It serves as a dynamic platform for individualized efficacy prediction, new drug development, and accelerating precision medicine. In the era of immunotherapy, the neoadjuvant setting presents unique opportunities to decipher tumor biology and microenvironment evolution under therapeutic pressure. Methods This review systematically analyzes translational studies leveraging neoadjuvant platforms, focusing on their role in addressing challenges in immunotherapy, such as treatment benefit heterogeneity and response assessment complexity. We examine key clinical trials, including I-SPY 2, KEYNOTE-522, and others to elucidate how these platforms bridge laboratory discoveries with clinical practice. Results The I-SPY 2 trial demonstrated the potential of adaptive platform frameworks to accelerate precision therapy, redefine targeted therapy strategies, and validate immunotherapy-containing regimens. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown significant benefits, yet patient selection remains complex. Translational research has identified limitations in conventional biomarkers and highlighted the need for multi-factor predictive models. Innovative assessment methods, including lymph node response evaluation and liquid biopsy for dynamic monitoring, have shown promise in early identification of responders. Conclusion Translational research based on neoadjuvant platforms holds immense value for refining precision immunotherapy in breast cancer. By integrating high-quality clinical cohort data, biological samples, and high-throughput sequencing, these studies help define benefit populations, identify effective regimens, and obtain drug resistance information. Future research should focus on multidimensional biomarker discovery, innovative efficacy evaluation, and dynamic monitoring to maximize patient benefits and reduce treatment risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Holistic Integrative Oncology
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44178-025-00219-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The evolving landscape of bench-to-bedside translation in the era of neoadjuvant platforms: perspectives and opportunities

Litong Yao, Nayu Chong, Mozhi Wang, Yingying Xu
1 citations
Holistic Integrative Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
24.82
article

The evolving landscape of bench-to-bedside translation in the era of neoadjuvant platforms: perspectives and opportunities

Litong Yao, Nayu Chong, Mozhi Wang, Yingying Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as a crucial treatment paradigm for locally advanced and early-stage breast cancer, offering clinical benefits beyond tumor downstaging. It serves as a dynamic platform for individualized efficacy prediction, new drug development, and accelerating precision medicine. In the era of immunotherapy, the neoadjuvant setting presents unique opportunities to decipher tumor biology and microenvironment evolution under therapeutic pressure. Methods This review systematically analyzes translational studies leveraging neoadjuvant platforms, focusing on their role in addressing challenges in immunotherapy, such as treatment benefit heterogeneity and response assessment complexity. We examine key clinical trials, including I-SPY 2, KEYNOTE-522, and others to elucidate how these platforms bridge laboratory discoveries with clinical practice. Results The I-SPY 2 trial demonstrated the potential of adaptive platform frameworks to accelerate precision therapy, redefine targeted therapy strategies, and validate immunotherapy-containing regimens. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown significant benefits, yet patient selection remains complex. Translational research has identified limitations in conventional biomarkers and highlighted the need for multi-factor predictive models. Innovative assessment methods, including lymph node response evaluation and liquid biopsy for dynamic monitoring, have shown promise in early identification of responders. Conclusion Translational research based on neoadjuvant platforms holds immense value for refining precision immunotherapy in breast cancer. By integrating high-quality clinical cohort data, biological samples, and high-throughput sequencing, these studies help define benefit populations, identify effective regimens, and obtain drug resistance information. Future research should focus on multidimensional biomarker discovery, innovative efficacy evaluation, and dynamic monitoring to maximize patient benefits and reduce treatment risks.

Holistic Integrative OncologyVol. 5(1)
First Hospital of China Medical University (CN), China Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
24.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.