Specialized for the Reach: Visual Control of Fruit Picking and Positional Behavior Favor a Reach Over a Grasp Phenotype for Geoffroy's Spider Monkey (Ateles geoffroyi)

The Geoffroy’s spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) has distinctive features, including a vestigial external thumb, elongated fingers and forelimbs, and a prehensile tail. The purpose of the present study was to understand how this derived morphology influences visually mediated reach and grasp movements during fruit picking. Wild spider monkeys, habituated to human observers, were filmed in Sector Santa Rosa (SSR), Área de Conservación Guanacaste in northwestern Costa Rica. We analyzed frame-by-frame video recordings of the monkeys picking 14 fruit species. The most frequent reach strategy was a branch-withdraw (62%; 1,338 of 2,164 fruit items), in which the monkeys hooked their fingers around a branch and pulled it toward themselves, to take the attached fruit by mouth. They sometimes used just their mouth to reach (17% of observations). Reaching with arm and hand extension to pick fruit by hand (21% of observations) was achieved using power grasps that relied on tactile cues. It is likely that picking fruit by hand or mouth involved foveal vision whereas grasping and manipulation branches used peripheral vision. Most fruit-picking sequences featured tail prehension on a branch, which extended the monkeys’ reach horizontally and ventrally into the small distal branches of the canopy. The observed reach strategies and the configuration of visually guided reaching skills of the hands and mouth—contrasted with the absence of visually mediated grasps—indicate that spider monkeys exhibit a reach phenotype. This contrasts with the grasp phenotype of the sympatric capuchin monkey, which uses the thumb and fingers to pick individual fruit items. These findings support the idea that the reach and the grasp have separate evolutionary histories in spider and capuchin monkeys, potentially facilitating fruit harvesting in different microcanopy locations and thereby contributing to niche partitioning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Behavior and Cognition
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.13.01.02.2026
Primary Topic
Primate Behavior and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Specialized for the Reach: Visual Control of Fruit Picking and Positional Behavior Favor a Reach Over a Grasp Phenotype for Geoffroy's Spider Monkey (Ateles geoffroyi)

Megan A. Mah, Evin Murillo Chacon, Jordan Dudley, Ian Q. Whishaw et al.
Animal Behavior and Cognition
Primate Behavior and Ecology
article

Specialized for the Reach: Visual Control of Fruit Picking and Positional Behavior Favor a Reach Over a Grasp Phenotype for Geoffroy's Spider Monkey (Ateles geoffroyi)

Megan A. Mah, Evin Murillo Chacon, Jordan Dudley, Ian Q. Whishaw, Filippo Aureli, Amanda Melin, Fernando Campos, Paulo Ramírez González
article en

Abstract

The Geoffroy’s spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) has distinctive features, including a vestigial external thumb, elongated fingers and forelimbs, and a prehensile tail. The purpose of the present study was to understand how this derived morphology influences visually mediated reach and grasp movements during fruit picking. Wild spider monkeys, habituated to human observers, were filmed in Sector Santa Rosa (SSR), Área de Conservación Guanacaste in northwestern Costa Rica. We analyzed frame-by-frame video recordings of the monkeys picking 14 fruit species. The most frequent reach strategy was a branch-withdraw (62%; 1,338 of 2,164 fruit items), in which the monkeys hooked their fingers around a branch and pulled it toward themselves, to take the attached fruit by mouth. They sometimes used just their mouth to reach (17% of observations). Reaching with arm and hand extension to pick fruit by hand (21% of observations) was achieved using power grasps that relied on tactile cues. It is likely that picking fruit by hand or mouth involved foveal vision whereas grasping and manipulation branches used peripheral vision. Most fruit-picking sequences featured tail prehension on a branch, which extended the monkeys’ reach horizontally and ventrally into the small distal branches of the canopy. The observed reach strategies and the configuration of visually guided reaching skills of the hands and mouth—contrasted with the absence of visually mediated grasps—indicate that spider monkeys exhibit a reach phenotype. This contrasts with the grasp phenotype of the sympatric capuchin monkey, which uses the thumb and fingers to pick individual fruit items. These findings support the idea that the reach and the grasp have separate evolutionary histories in spider and capuchin monkeys, potentially facilitating fruit harvesting in different microcanopy locations and thereby contributing to niche partitioning.

Animal Behavior and CognitionVol. 13(1)
Canada Research Chairs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Primate Behavior and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.