A coupled Hydro–Biogeochemical framework for evaluating lateral loss of soil organic carbon under land-use change at the basin scale

The 'Grain for Green' (GFG) project is a key ecological restoration initiative in the Loess Plateau. The land use changes induced by GFG project have the potential to alter the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC), yet its impact on the lateral loss of SOC was not well understood or insufficiently quantified. This study was to develop a comprehensive framework using a coupled hydro-biological model (SWAT-DayCent) together with incorporating an empirical carbon enrichment coefficient for quantitatively assessing soil and SOC losses in a typical watershed in the Chinese Loess Plateau-the Weihe River Basin (WRB). The results revealed that the GFG project reduced cropland area from 58.64 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 1995 to 54.55 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 2020, while forest area expanded from 21.13 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 1995 to 22.14 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 2020. Grassland area initially declined from 50.20 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 1995 to 49.62 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 2000, before increasing to 51.39 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 2020. Areas with high soil erosion and SOC loss in the basin are predominantly located in its western and southern regions, while low-value areas are mainly concentrated in the northern and central-eastern regions, exhibiting strong spatial heterogeneity. The GFG project significantly reduced the soil erosion and SOC loss in WRB, thereby enhancing regional soil carbon sequestration capacity. Compared to cropland-to-grassland conversion (CTG), the reduction in soil and SOC losses was more pronounced for cropland-to-forest conversion (CTF). Specifically, under the CTF program, soil erosion decreased from 1179.13 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> in the baseline period (1995, before GFG) to 15.24 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> (2015, about 99% reduction), and 98% reduction was found for SOC (from 10.29 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> to 0.22 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>). For the CTG program, soil loss decreased by 76% (from 965.29 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> to 232.95 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>), and SOC loss decreased by 74% (from 8.68 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> to 2.25 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>). The findings of this study can be valuable for soil conservation and carbon sink management in the Loess Plateau, and the framework we developed can be potentially applicable in other areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128981
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A coupled Hydro–Biogeochemical framework for evaluating lateral loss of soil organic carbon under land-use change at the basin scale

G. A. Alexandrov, Guangchuang Zhang, Zexin Meng, Zhao Jin et al.
Journal of Environmental Management
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

A coupled Hydro–Biogeochemical framework for evaluating lateral loss of soil organic carbon under land-use change at the basin scale

G. A. Alexandrov, Guangchuang Zhang, Zexin Meng, Zhao Jin, Shuguang Liu, Yuan‐Ping Han, Yuqian Lei, Fubo Zhao, Sergey Kivalov, Yue Wu, Zhao Jin, Ji Chen, Weiqin Dang, Xiankai Luo, Pengcheng Sun, Fan Wang, Yuheng Yang, Linjing Qiu, Xixi Lu
article en

Abstract

The 'Grain for Green' (GFG) project is a key ecological restoration initiative in the Loess Plateau. The land use changes induced by GFG project have the potential to alter the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC), yet its impact on the lateral loss of SOC was not well understood or insufficiently quantified. This study was to develop a comprehensive framework using a coupled hydro-biological model (SWAT-DayCent) together with incorporating an empirical carbon enrichment coefficient for quantitatively assessing soil and SOC losses in a typical watershed in the Chinese Loess Plateau-the Weihe River Basin (WRB). The results revealed that the GFG project reduced cropland area from 58.64 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 1995 to 54.55 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 2020, while forest area expanded from 21.13 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 1995 to 22.14 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 2020. Grassland area initially declined from 50.20 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 1995 to 49.62 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 2000, before increasing to 51.39 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup> in 2020. Areas with high soil erosion and SOC loss in the basin are predominantly located in its western and southern regions, while low-value areas are mainly concentrated in the northern and central-eastern regions, exhibiting strong spatial heterogeneity. The GFG project significantly reduced the soil erosion and SOC loss in WRB, thereby enhancing regional soil carbon sequestration capacity. Compared to cropland-to-grassland conversion (CTG), the reduction in soil and SOC losses was more pronounced for cropland-to-forest conversion (CTF). Specifically, under the CTF program, soil erosion decreased from 1179.13 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> in the baseline period (1995, before GFG) to 15.24 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> (2015, about 99% reduction), and 98% reduction was found for SOC (from 10.29 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> to 0.22 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>). For the CTG program, soil loss decreased by 76% (from 965.29 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> to 232.95 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>), and SOC loss decreased by 74% (from 8.68 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> to 2.25 t km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>). The findings of this study can be valuable for soil conservation and carbon sink management in the Loess Plateau, and the framework we developed can be potentially applicable in other areas.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 401
National University of Singapore (SG), Hainan University (CN), Chang'an University (CN), Institute of Physical-Chemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science (RU), Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics (RU), Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China (CN), Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research (CN), Institute of Earth Environment (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.