Virtual Reality in Free-Flying Honey Bees: A Replication of Abramson et al. (1996)

In two previous experiments, Abramson and colleagues (1996) used a mirage device to demonstrate that honey bees could be influenced by a virtual reality illusion. The current study sought to replicate several key findings of their second experiment by simultaneously presenting honey bees with both a real and illusory target from which to feed. Results for sixteen subjects largely replicated those reported by Abramson and colleagues, but only when individual response patterns were considered. As a group, illusion vs. real target error rates decreased linearly over study trials. However, using organism-centered (i.e., person-centered) analyses, this effect was discovered to be attributable to only two honey bees. Considered as individuals, and consistent with previous findings, the error rates for most of the bees in this sample did not decrease over time. Results therefore support the use of the mirage device in future studies of visual illusions in insects. Implications for analyzing error rates and other important outcomes in such studies are further discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Behavior and Cognition
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.13.01.03.2026
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual Reality in Free-Flying Honey Bees: A Replication of Abramson et al. (1996)

James Grice, Charles I. Abramson, Ian Jones
Animal Behavior and Cognition
Insect and Pesticide Research
article

Virtual Reality in Free-Flying Honey Bees: A Replication of Abramson et al. (1996)

James Grice, Charles I. Abramson, Ian Jones
article en

Abstract

In two previous experiments, Abramson and colleagues (1996) used a mirage device to demonstrate that honey bees could be influenced by a virtual reality illusion. The current study sought to replicate several key findings of their second experiment by simultaneously presenting honey bees with both a real and illusory target from which to feed. Results for sixteen subjects largely replicated those reported by Abramson and colleagues, but only when individual response patterns were considered. As a group, illusion vs. real target error rates decreased linearly over study trials. However, using organism-centered (i.e., person-centered) analyses, this effect was discovered to be attributable to only two honey bees. Considered as individuals, and consistent with previous findings, the error rates for most of the bees in this sample did not decrease over time. Results therefore support the use of the mirage device in future studies of visual illusions in insects. Implications for analyzing error rates and other important outcomes in such studies are further discussed.

Animal Behavior and CognitionVol. 13(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Insect and Pesticide Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Virtual Reality in Free-Flying Honey Bees: A Replication of Abramson et al. (1996) — James Grice, Charles I. Abramson, et al. · Animal Behavior and Cognition (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS