Revealing driving factors of groundwater level depth changes in China using interpretable machine learning and the optimal GeoDetector model

Based on landform types, hydrogeological structure, and groundwater types across mainland China, the region was divided into five hydrogeological zones. We compiled GLD records from 1742 monitoring wells across China (2005–2016) and analyzed 12-year spatiotemporal variations using the Mann–Kendall test with Sen’s slope estimator. We further used interpretable machine learning (IML) techniques and the optimal GeoDetector model to explore the influences of human activities, climate, vegetation, soil, surface water, groundwater, and topography on GLD, and to identify the key drivers of GLD dynamics. At the national scale, groundwater systems generally show a trend in which degradation outweighs improvement, particularly in the Huang–Huai–Hai Plain. GLD in both unconfined and confined aquifers follows a “deep in the west and shallow in the east” pattern. Precipitation (PRE), temperature (TEM), and groundwater abstraction (GWA) are the key factors controlling GLD changes. Results from SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and GeoDetector consistently indicate that groundwater system responses are primarily driven by the coupled effects of multiple factors rather than by any single driver. SHAP further reveals pronounced nonlinear and threshold responses among interacting factors. Overall, the coupled influences of GWA and climatic variables constitute the core mechanisms shaping GLD variations. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing region-specific groundwater management strategies in China. • Interpretable machine learning and GeoDetector disentangle drivers of GLD. • GLD across China shows a national trend in which degradation exceeds recovery. • Precipitation, temperature, and abstraction are identified as key GLD factors. • GeoDetector emphasizes spatial synergies, while SHAP captures nonlinear effects. • Coupled climate–abstraction effects drive groundwater dynamics across China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103248
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revealing driving factors of groundwater level depth changes in China using interpretable machine learning and the optimal GeoDetector model

Naifu Jin, Aizhong Ding, Lei Chen, Zhengyan Li et al.
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
article

Revealing driving factors of groundwater level depth changes in China using interpretable machine learning and the optimal GeoDetector model

Naifu Jin, Aizhong Ding, Lei Chen, Zhengyan Li, Yujing Guo, Lirong Cheng, Xiaohui Chen
article en

Abstract

Based on landform types, hydrogeological structure, and groundwater types across mainland China, the region was divided into five hydrogeological zones. We compiled GLD records from 1742 monitoring wells across China (2005–2016) and analyzed 12-year spatiotemporal variations using the Mann–Kendall test with Sen’s slope estimator. We further used interpretable machine learning (IML) techniques and the optimal GeoDetector model to explore the influences of human activities, climate, vegetation, soil, surface water, groundwater, and topography on GLD, and to identify the key drivers of GLD dynamics. At the national scale, groundwater systems generally show a trend in which degradation outweighs improvement, particularly in the Huang–Huai–Hai Plain. GLD in both unconfined and confined aquifers follows a “deep in the west and shallow in the east” pattern. Precipitation (PRE), temperature (TEM), and groundwater abstraction (GWA) are the key factors controlling GLD changes. Results from SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and GeoDetector consistently indicate that groundwater system responses are primarily driven by the coupled effects of multiple factors rather than by any single driver. SHAP further reveals pronounced nonlinear and threshold responses among interacting factors. Overall, the coupled influences of GWA and climatic variables constitute the core mechanisms shaping GLD variations. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing region-specific groundwater management strategies in China. • Interpretable machine learning and GeoDetector disentangle drivers of GLD. • GLD across China shows a national trend in which degradation exceeds recovery. • Precipitation, temperature, and abstraction are identified as key GLD factors. • GeoDetector emphasizes spatial synergies, while SHAP captures nonlinear effects. • Coupled climate–abstraction effects drive groundwater dynamics across China.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 64
University of Leeds (GB), Beijing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.