Geographic and Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Hospice in Pennsylvania

ContextHospice is a core component of end-of-life care in the United States, designed to provide comprehensive support for patients and their families. While utilization has expanded, concerns remain about whether growth has translated into equitable access. Geographic, socioeconomic, and organizational factors, such as ownership and quality, may shape the availability and type of hospice care patients receive.ObjectivesTo examine geographic and sociodemographic disparities in access to hospice providers across Pennsylvania, a geographically and demographically diverse state.MethodsThis study used 2023 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Provider of Services data to identify hospices by ownership type and quality rating. Provider addresses were geocoded, and 60-minute drive-time catchments were generated. Census tract-level hospice access was assessed using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic to identify cold spots, defined as clusters of tracts with significantly lower access relative to statewide patterns. Tract-level sociodemographic characteristics were drawn from the 2023 American Community Survey, and mean differences were evaluated using two-sample t-tests.ResultsIn total, 2.3 million Pennsylvanians, or 17% of the state population, reside in census tracts classified as cold spots. Cold spots were concentrated in rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged regions. Compared with other tracts, cold spot tracts were lower income, less educated, older, more reliant on public insurance, and less racially diverse. Patterns were consistent when restricting to high quality hospice and nonprofit hospices.ConclusionGeographic disparities in hospice access compound existing sociodemographic inequities. Addressing these inequities will require efforts to expand high-quality hospice availability in underserved communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261425959
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geographic and Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Hospice in Pennsylvania

Coleman Drake, Dylan Nagy, Jacob Whitman, Yael Schenker et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Geographic and Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Hospice in Pennsylvania

Coleman Drake, Dylan Nagy, Jacob Whitman, Yael Schenker, Lindsay Sabik, Harsheni Sudakar
article en

Abstract

ContextHospice is a core component of end-of-life care in the United States, designed to provide comprehensive support for patients and their families. While utilization has expanded, concerns remain about whether growth has translated into equitable access. Geographic, socioeconomic, and organizational factors, such as ownership and quality, may shape the availability and type of hospice care patients receive.ObjectivesTo examine geographic and sociodemographic disparities in access to hospice providers across Pennsylvania, a geographically and demographically diverse state.MethodsThis study used 2023 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Provider of Services data to identify hospices by ownership type and quality rating. Provider addresses were geocoded, and 60-minute drive-time catchments were generated. Census tract-level hospice access was assessed using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic to identify cold spots, defined as clusters of tracts with significantly lower access relative to statewide patterns. Tract-level sociodemographic characteristics were drawn from the 2023 American Community Survey, and mean differences were evaluated using two-sample t-tests.ResultsIn total, 2.3 million Pennsylvanians, or 17% of the state population, reside in census tracts classified as cold spots. Cold spots were concentrated in rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged regions. Compared with other tracts, cold spot tracts were lower income, less educated, older, more reliant on public insurance, and less racially diverse. Patterns were consistent when restricting to high quality hospice and nonprofit hospices.ConclusionGeographic disparities in hospice access compound existing sociodemographic inequities. Addressing these inequities will require efforts to expand high-quality hospice availability in underserved communities.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
University of Pittsburgh (US), Denver Health Medical Center (US), UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.