Performance comparison of MPPT controllers in a grid-connected PV system: LCOE and payback period approaches

The utilization of renewable energy sources significantly increased in response to the growing global energy demand. Rising concerns about the environment, the photovoltaic (PV) systems emerged as prominent and widely adopted among all other renewable energies. The installation cost of PV systems is more however, the recent advancements in PV technology have made them feasible for a wide range of applications. In addition to module and inverter efficiencies, the overall efficiency of a PV system also depends upon the efficiency of the tracking method. The conventional and intelligent methods are experiencing low tracking efficiency under different irradiation and temperature conditions. PV grid integration can be done in two methods. The single stage grid connected systems can experience problems related to power quality and stability of the DC link voltage at low irradiance levels. To limit this problem, two-stage systems are preferable for maintaining a stable DC-link voltage. This research evaluates several MPPT strategies, including conventional approaches (perturbation and observation, incremental conductivity) and intelligent techniques (fuzzy logic controllers, ANFIS), and proposes a hybrid AGORNN controller, that is based on the Adaptive Grasshopper Optimization Recurrent Neural Network strategy. The performance of each method is assessed through parameters such as PV maximum power (Pmpp), DC link voltage (Vdclink), MPPT tracking efficiency η_MPPT (%), Vdc Ripple Vdcr (%), response time (Tres), overshoot Osh (%), utilization efficiency η_ut (%), THD, cost analysis, and payback period (PB). The results of simulations, which were examined using MATLAB/Simulink (R2023b), and compared with existing hybrid MPPT control methods. It exhibits that the proposed AGORNN controller is more effective than the standard and intelligent MPPT. The novel hybrid MPPT controller was examined under the conditions of STC and different irradiance and temperature, which were referred to as PTC. In STC tracking and conversion efficiencies are 99.86 and 96.55, respectively. The efficiencies under PTC are 96% and 91.50%, which ensures a promising solution to high efficiency grid-connected PV systems. The LCOE and Payback Period are also estimated and compared with other methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39500-9
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance comparison of MPPT controllers in a grid-connected PV system: LCOE and payback period approaches

Sainadh Singh Kshatri, Abdulaziz Alanazi, G. Kumar, Moustafa Ahmed Ibrahim et al.
Scientific Reports
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
article

Performance comparison of MPPT controllers in a grid-connected PV system: LCOE and payback period approaches

Sainadh Singh Kshatri, Abdulaziz Alanazi, G. Kumar, Moustafa Ahmed Ibrahim, P. Chandra Babu, Chagam Reddy Subba Rami Reddy
article en

Abstract

The utilization of renewable energy sources significantly increased in response to the growing global energy demand. Rising concerns about the environment, the photovoltaic (PV) systems emerged as prominent and widely adopted among all other renewable energies. The installation cost of PV systems is more however, the recent advancements in PV technology have made them feasible for a wide range of applications. In addition to module and inverter efficiencies, the overall efficiency of a PV system also depends upon the efficiency of the tracking method. The conventional and intelligent methods are experiencing low tracking efficiency under different irradiation and temperature conditions. PV grid integration can be done in two methods. The single stage grid connected systems can experience problems related to power quality and stability of the DC link voltage at low irradiance levels. To limit this problem, two-stage systems are preferable for maintaining a stable DC-link voltage. This research evaluates several MPPT strategies, including conventional approaches (perturbation and observation, incremental conductivity) and intelligent techniques (fuzzy logic controllers, ANFIS), and proposes a hybrid AGORNN controller, that is based on the Adaptive Grasshopper Optimization Recurrent Neural Network strategy. The performance of each method is assessed through parameters such as PV maximum power (Pmpp), DC link voltage (Vdclink), MPPT tracking efficiency η_MPPT (%), Vdc Ripple Vdcr (%), response time (Tres), overshoot Osh (%), utilization efficiency η_ut (%), THD, cost analysis, and payback period (PB). The results of simulations, which were examined using MATLAB/Simulink (R2023b), and compared with existing hybrid MPPT control methods. It exhibits that the proposed AGORNN controller is more effective than the standard and intelligent MPPT. The novel hybrid MPPT controller was examined under the conditions of STC and different irradiance and temperature, which were referred to as PTC. In STC tracking and conversion efficiencies are 99.86 and 96.55, respectively. The efficiencies under PTC are 96% and 91.50%, which ensures a promising solution to high efficiency grid-connected PV systems. The LCOE and Payback Period are also estimated and compared with other methods.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Northern Border University (SA), P.V. Narsimha Rao Telangana Veterinary University (IN), University of Business and Technology (SA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.