A dual respiratory and auditory function for the coelacanth lung
Since the discovery of Latimeria chalumnae, coelacanths have provided a critical comparative framework for reconstructing ancestral sarcopterygian anatomy. However, the function of several anatomical features in both extant and fossil coelacanths remains unresolved. Among these, the presence of large ossified chambers in the body cavity of fossil coelacanths has remained enigmatic, with different studies proposing respiratory or auditory functions. Here, we examine lung and inner ear anatomy based on new observations from synchrotron phase-contrast microCT scans of two 240-million-year-old latimerioid coelacanths, alongside multiple developmental stages of the extant L. chalumnae. These data, combined with archival histological sections of L. chalumnae and 3D reconstructions of a Devonian coelacanth, suggest that extinct coelacanths possessed an ossified lung capable of transmitting sound pressure to auditory sensory epithelia in the inner ear via a perilymphatic system. We propose that the lung of extinct coelacanths supported both respiratory and auditory functions.
Authors
- Lionel Cavin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9666-5864)
- Kathleen Dollman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-4896)
- Luigi Manuelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0620-4599)
- Bernd Fritzsch
- Marc Herbin
- Per E. Ahlberg
- Gaël Clément
Institutions
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- Natural History Museum of Geneva (CH)
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (FR)
- Sorbonne Université (FR)
- Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR)
- Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution (FR)
- Structure et Instabilité des Génomes (FR)
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Communications Biology
- Published
- 2026-02-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09708-6
- Primary Topic
- Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00