Experiences of online Change Laboratory research-interventions in miniature in doctoral education

This paper addresses the issue of fostering expansive learning in doctoral education using a Change Laboratory-in-miniature approach. Doctoral students face many problems when understanding activity-theoretical methodologies such as the Change Laboratory. While cutting-edge and promising, these are not easy to grasp for newcomers. In a practice context increasingly prioritising timely completion, such obstacles incentivise students towards adopting conservative, well-understood research approaches. This paper explores how the Change Laboratory in miniature can provide doctoral students with a Change Laboratory experience, but emphasises that the success of this endeavour depends on such projects addressing genuine practice problems experienced by the doctoral students in their own lives. Two miniature projects are considered—each conducted online, over a few weeks, with globally distributed cohorts of distance doctoral students. The projects’ objects, selected by the cohorts themselves, respectively concerned the informal mutual support provided by networks of online PhD students; and the use of Generative AI tools in academic research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Published
2025-12-29
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of online Change Laboratory research-interventions in miniature in doctoral education

Brett Bligh
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
article

Experiences of online Change Laboratory research-interventions in miniature in doctoral education

Brett Bligh
article en

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of fostering expansive learning in doctoral education using a Change Laboratory-in-miniature approach. Doctoral students face many problems when understanding activity-theoretical methodologies such as the Change Laboratory. While cutting-edge and promising, these are not easy to grasp for newcomers. In a practice context increasingly prioritising timely completion, such obstacles incentivise students towards adopting conservative, well-understood research approaches. This paper explores how the Change Laboratory in miniature can provide doctoral students with a Change Laboratory experience, but emphasises that the success of this endeavour depends on such projects addressing genuine practice problems experienced by the doctoral students in their own lives. Two miniature projects are considered—each conducted online, over a few weeks, with globally distributed cohorts of distance doctoral students. The projects’ objects, selected by the cohorts themselves, respectively concerned the informal mutual support provided by networks of online PhD students; and the use of Generative AI tools in academic research.

Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Experiences of online Change Laboratory research-interventions in miniature in doctoral education — Brett Bligh · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS