Етнічна ментальність як когнітивно-лінгвістична матриця: нові напрями дослідження

Language, as a means of communication, also functions as a core instrument for encoding and transmitting cultural and cognitive frameworks. It embodies the speakers’ worldview, value orientations, and sociocultural norms, acting as a reflection of ethnic mentality and modes of thinking. This paper synthesizes key insights from linguocultural, psycholinguistic, and social/biosocial perspectives to conceptualize the interdependence among mentality, ethnos and language. Ethnic mentality, understood as a system of culturally conditioned cognitive dispositions, shapes communicative strategies, linguistic choices, and interpretive practices. Theoretical foundations trace back to classical linguistics and philosophy of language, which emphasized the link between national language and spiritual culture. Contemporary research extends this view, highlighting mentality as a determinant of communicative norms and cultural scripts. Intercultural communication studies reveal that successful interaction in globalized contexts requires negotiating intersecting identities and cultural resources, while migration research underscores ambivalence between heritage maintenance and host-society integration. Language education research demonstrates the role of metacognitive strategies such as planning, monitoring, evaluating in regulating second-language acquisition, linking cognitive dispositions to communicative performance. Psycholinguistic models, including mindshaping theory, argue that language not only conveys information but also structures thought, externalizing beliefs and enabling shared cognition. Stereotypes, as culturally and linguistically embedded constructs, further illustrate how mentality manifests in discourse: they organize social perception, influence pragmatic expectations, and sustain identity boundaries. Finally, conceptions of ethnos, whether social or biosocial, anchor these dynamics in historical, territorial, and cultural frameworks, reinforcing the interplay between biological, social, and symbolic dimensions. Integrating these strands provides a holistic understanding of language as both a reflection and a constitutive force of ethnic mentality and cognition, with implications for intercultural competence, educational policy, and the mitigation of communicative barriers in multilingual societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Published
2026-02-12
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Етнічна ментальність як когнітивно-лінгвістична матриця: нові напрями дослідження

Лариса Мелешкевич
Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Етнічна ментальність як когнітивно-лінгвістична матриця: нові напрями дослідження

Лариса Мелешкевич
article en

Abstract

Language, as a means of communication, also functions as a core instrument for encoding and transmitting cultural and cognitive frameworks. It embodies the speakers’ worldview, value orientations, and sociocultural norms, acting as a reflection of ethnic mentality and modes of thinking. This paper synthesizes key insights from linguocultural, psycholinguistic, and social/biosocial perspectives to conceptualize the interdependence among mentality, ethnos and language. Ethnic mentality, understood as a system of culturally conditioned cognitive dispositions, shapes communicative strategies, linguistic choices, and interpretive practices. Theoretical foundations trace back to classical linguistics and philosophy of language, which emphasized the link between national language and spiritual culture. Contemporary research extends this view, highlighting mentality as a determinant of communicative norms and cultural scripts. Intercultural communication studies reveal that successful interaction in globalized contexts requires negotiating intersecting identities and cultural resources, while migration research underscores ambivalence between heritage maintenance and host-society integration. Language education research demonstrates the role of metacognitive strategies such as planning, monitoring, evaluating in regulating second-language acquisition, linking cognitive dispositions to communicative performance. Psycholinguistic models, including mindshaping theory, argue that language not only conveys information but also structures thought, externalizing beliefs and enabling shared cognition. Stereotypes, as culturally and linguistically embedded constructs, further illustrate how mentality manifests in discourse: they organize social perception, influence pragmatic expectations, and sustain identity boundaries. Finally, conceptions of ethnos, whether social or biosocial, anchor these dynamics in historical, territorial, and cultural frameworks, reinforcing the interplay between biological, social, and symbolic dimensions. Integrating these strands provides a holistic understanding of language as both a reflection and a constitutive force of ethnic mentality and cognition, with implications for intercultural competence, educational policy, and the mitigation of communicative barriers in multilingual societies.

Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Kyiv National Linguistic University (UA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Етнічна ментальність як когнітивно-лінгвістична матриця: нові напрями дослідження — Лариса Мелешкевич · Scientific periodicals of Ukraine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS