Adolescent views on participating in HIV biomedical research during pregnancy: a qualitative analysis of motivators and barriers

Pregnant adolescents are often excluded from biomedical HIV research participation, resulting in less evidence to inform safe and effective treatment and prevention strategies. We explored adolescent views on enrollment in biomedical HIV research during pregnancy via in-depth interviews with ever-pregnant adolescents living with and at-risk of HIV age 15-20 years in Botswana and Malawi. A semi-structured interview guide explored decision-making around study enrollment during pregnancy using vignettes depicting two hypothetical HIV studies: (1) testing pregnancy-specific dosage of an HIV medication, and (2) a randomized control trial comparing an oral regimen to a new injectable. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed, translated to English, coded in NVivo, and thematically analyzed for emergent themes in participation motivators/barriers. Of the 80 adolescents interviewed (40 living with and 40 at-risk of HIV), 73 (91.3%) were interested in joining vignette study 1 and 65 (81.3%) in vignette 2. Participation motivators included treating/preventing HIV<u>,</u> gaining health knowledge, and helping others. Barriers included study participation requirements, the studies' experimental nature, and randomization. Adolescents' high interest in and reasons for participation during pregnancy suggest their exclusion from biomedical HIV research may be inconsistent with their views, interests, and capacities, providing important considerations for ethical and inclusive study design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS Care
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2026.2628310
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adolescent views on participating in HIV biomedical research during pregnancy: a qualitative analysis of motivators and barriers

Kehumile Ramontshonyana, Rita Vanessa Masese, Ontibile Tshume, Aishah Hagan-Bezgin et al.
AIDS Care
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Adolescent views on participating in HIV biomedical research during pregnancy: a qualitative analysis of motivators and barriers

Kehumile Ramontshonyana, Rita Vanessa Masese, Ontibile Tshume, Aishah Hagan-Bezgin, Mbabi Bapabi, Kristen Sullivan, Landon Myer, Picrina Winner, Aamirah Mussa, Annie Thom, Pearson Mmodzi, Raksha Rajeshmohan, Agatha Bula, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Hadas Clementine Baron
article en

Abstract

Pregnant adolescents are often excluded from biomedical HIV research participation, resulting in less evidence to inform safe and effective treatment and prevention strategies. We explored adolescent views on enrollment in biomedical HIV research during pregnancy via in-depth interviews with ever-pregnant adolescents living with and at-risk of HIV age 15-20 years in Botswana and Malawi. A semi-structured interview guide explored decision-making around study enrollment during pregnancy using vignettes depicting two hypothetical HIV studies: (1) testing pregnancy-specific dosage of an HIV medication, and (2) a randomized control trial comparing an oral regimen to a new injectable. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed, translated to English, coded in NVivo, and thematically analyzed for emergent themes in participation motivators/barriers. Of the 80 adolescents interviewed (40 living with and 40 at-risk of HIV), 73 (91.3%) were interested in joining vignette study 1 and 65 (81.3%) in vignette 2. Participation motivators included treating/preventing HIV<u>,</u> gaining health knowledge, and helping others. Barriers included study participation requirements, the studies' experimental nature, and randomization. Adolescents' high interest in and reasons for participation during pregnancy suggest their exclusion from biomedical HIV research may be inconsistent with their views, interests, and capacities, providing important considerations for ethical and inclusive study design.

AIDS Care
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), North Carolina State University (US), Baylor University (US), University of Malawi (MW), University of Michigan (US), MRC Centre for Reproductive Health (GB), Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership (BW), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.