Poster Session I - A147 ENDOSCOPIC FINDINGS IN NON-ANEMIC IRON DEFICIENCY

Abstract Background Bidirectional endoscopy is recommended by major gastroenterology associations as part of the initial assessment of iron-deficiency anemia to rule out gastrointestinal (GI) pathology such as malignancy. However, current guidelines are less clear on the role of endoscopic evaluation in non-anemic iron deficiency (NAID). To date, there are no North American data describing the rate of clinically significant GI lesions in this population. Aims We aimed to determine the rates and etiologies of clinically significant GI lesions detected on bidirectional endoscopy in NAID, and to identify clinical risk factors associated with lesion detection. Methods We conducted a single-centre cross-sectional study of adults aged 18 or older who underwent elective outpatient bidirectional endoscopy for NAID at Kingston Health Sciences Centre between November 2019 and November 2024. Data were collected by retrospective chart review, including patient demographics, comorbidities, family history, medication history, iron indices, and menstrual status. The primary outcome was the detection of a GI lesion known to contribute to iron deficiency on bidirectional endoscopy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with lesion detection after controlling for age, sex, menstruation status, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and PPI use. Results A total of 167 patients were included in our study (median age 62 years [IQR 51-68]), range 18-91; 65% female; 19% with family history of GI malignancy). Clinically significant findings were identified in 49 patients (29%), including: malignancy (n = 4, 2%), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 4, 2%), celiac disease (n = 7, 4%), vascular lesion (n = 2, 1%), peptic ulcer disease (n = 4, 2%), gastritis (NSAID, H. pylori, or autoimmune related) (n-=15, 9%), Cameron’s erosions (n = 3, 2%), advanced polyp (n = 3, 2%), marginal ulcer (n = 1, 1%), portal hypertensive changes (n = 3, 2%), and severe erosive esophagitis (n = 4, 2%). 1 of the 49 patients had both IBD and Cameron’s erosions detected. On multivariate analysis, menstruation status (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.98) and PPI use (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.95) were associated with lower odds of detecting endoscopic findings. Conclusions Clinically significant endoscopic findings are common among patients investigated for NAID and mostly driven by gastritis, however the rate of detecting malignant lesions is low. Pre-menopausal patients with NAID were less likely to have findings detected on endoscopy, suggesting that endoscopic investigations could be avoided in this patient population in the absence of other risk factors. Patients with NAID should be evaluated for further endoscopic investigation after an informed discussion of the risks and benefits and consideration of the patient’s age and medical comorbidities. Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.147
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session I - A147 ENDOSCOPIC FINDINGS IN NON-ANEMIC IRON DEFICIENCY

Elizabeth Squirell, L Huynh
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Poster Session I - A147 ENDOSCOPIC FINDINGS IN NON-ANEMIC IRON DEFICIENCY

Elizabeth Squirell, L Huynh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Bidirectional endoscopy is recommended by major gastroenterology associations as part of the initial assessment of iron-deficiency anemia to rule out gastrointestinal (GI) pathology such as malignancy. However, current guidelines are less clear on the role of endoscopic evaluation in non-anemic iron deficiency (NAID). To date, there are no North American data describing the rate of clinically significant GI lesions in this population. Aims We aimed to determine the rates and etiologies of clinically significant GI lesions detected on bidirectional endoscopy in NAID, and to identify clinical risk factors associated with lesion detection. Methods We conducted a single-centre cross-sectional study of adults aged 18 or older who underwent elective outpatient bidirectional endoscopy for NAID at Kingston Health Sciences Centre between November 2019 and November 2024. Data were collected by retrospective chart review, including patient demographics, comorbidities, family history, medication history, iron indices, and menstrual status. The primary outcome was the detection of a GI lesion known to contribute to iron deficiency on bidirectional endoscopy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with lesion detection after controlling for age, sex, menstruation status, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and PPI use. Results A total of 167 patients were included in our study (median age 62 years [IQR 51-68]), range 18-91; 65% female; 19% with family history of GI malignancy). Clinically significant findings were identified in 49 patients (29%), including: malignancy (n = 4, 2%), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 4, 2%), celiac disease (n = 7, 4%), vascular lesion (n = 2, 1%), peptic ulcer disease (n = 4, 2%), gastritis (NSAID, H. pylori, or autoimmune related) (n-=15, 9%), Cameron’s erosions (n = 3, 2%), advanced polyp (n = 3, 2%), marginal ulcer (n = 1, 1%), portal hypertensive changes (n = 3, 2%), and severe erosive esophagitis (n = 4, 2%). 1 of the 49 patients had both IBD and Cameron’s erosions detected. On multivariate analysis, menstruation status (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.98) and PPI use (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.95) were associated with lower odds of detecting endoscopic findings. Conclusions Clinically significant endoscopic findings are common among patients investigated for NAID and mostly driven by gastritis, however the rate of detecting malignant lesions is low. Pre-menopausal patients with NAID were less likely to have findings detected on endoscopy, suggesting that endoscopic investigations could be avoided in this patient population in the absence of other risk factors. Patients with NAID should be evaluated for further endoscopic investigation after an informed discussion of the risks and benefits and consideration of the patient’s age and medical comorbidities. Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
Queen's University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.