Influence of different manufacturing materials on the accuracy and fitting of full‐arch restorations using a photogrammetry scanner—In vitro study

While photogrammetry provided clinically acceptable capture of implant position, the manufacturing material significantly affected the accuracy and passive fit of full-arch implant-supported restorations produced via photogrammetry-based workflows and alternative solutions should be used to validate the accurary of the manufacturing process in digital workflows. Titanium and zirconia demonstrated the best overall performance, supporting their suitability for final restorations. PMMA may be acceptable for provisional use, while 3D-printed resin showed limited reliability. When checking passive fit, all screws should be tightened simultaneously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Prosthodontics
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70109
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of different manufacturing materials on the accuracy and fitting of full‐arch restorations using a photogrammetry scanner—In vitro study

Lyndon F. Cooper, Paulo Sérgio Borella, Gus Khalil, Abidiel Silva Guimarães et al.
Journal of Prosthodontics
Dental materials and restorations
article

Influence of different manufacturing materials on the accuracy and fitting of full‐arch restorations using a photogrammetry scanner—In vitro study

Lyndon F. Cooper, Paulo Sérgio Borella, Gus Khalil, Abidiel Silva Guimarães, Thaís Silva MENDONÇA, Gustavo Mendonça, Sandra Al‐Tarawneh
article en

Abstract

While photogrammetry provided clinically acceptable capture of implant position, the manufacturing material significantly affected the accuracy and passive fit of full-arch implant-supported restorations produced via photogrammetry-based workflows and alternative solutions should be used to validate the accurary of the manufacturing process in digital workflows. Titanium and zirconia demonstrated the best overall performance, supporting their suitability for final restorations. PMMA may be acceptable for provisional use, while 3D-printed resin showed limited reliability. When checking passive fit, all screws should be tightened simultaneously.

Journal of Prosthodontics
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Orlando Clinical Research Center (US), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.