Entrepreneurship for the rural? A reflection on rural entrepreneurship in a time of multi-crisis

Abstract Rural areas in most of the world are facing a multi-crisis related to climate change, regional inequalities, and increasing political unrest. This calls for rethinking and exploring forms of entrepreneurial action that can engage with these crises. In this conceptual paper, we conduct a Weberian ideal type analysis and suggest that the prevailing ideal types of rural entrepreneurship run the risk of an epistemic fallacy and of inadvertently legitimizing centralizing policies. To address this, we propose a new ideal type of “entrepreneurship for the rural” that highlights the need to engage with issues of spatial justice, which lie at the heart of the conflicts and potentials that constitute the current multi-crisis. The ideal type of “entrepreneurship for the rural” emphasizes institutional and political forms of entrepreneurship that seek to create changes in the structural conditions of regional inequality and spatial patterns of opportunity. Further research into this type of entrepreneurship is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Business Economics
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-026-01184-w
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entrepreneurship for the rural? A reflection on rural entrepreneurship in a time of multi-crisis

Gary Bosworth, Johan Gaddefors, Steffen Korsgaard
Small Business Economics
Rural development and sustainability
article

Entrepreneurship for the rural? A reflection on rural entrepreneurship in a time of multi-crisis

Gary Bosworth, Johan Gaddefors, Steffen Korsgaard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rural areas in most of the world are facing a multi-crisis related to climate change, regional inequalities, and increasing political unrest. This calls for rethinking and exploring forms of entrepreneurial action that can engage with these crises. In this conceptual paper, we conduct a Weberian ideal type analysis and suggest that the prevailing ideal types of rural entrepreneurship run the risk of an epistemic fallacy and of inadvertently legitimizing centralizing policies. To address this, we propose a new ideal type of “entrepreneurship for the rural” that highlights the need to engage with issues of spatial justice, which lie at the heart of the conflicts and potentials that constitute the current multi-crisis. The ideal type of “entrepreneurship for the rural” emphasizes institutional and political forms of entrepreneurship that seek to create changes in the structural conditions of regional inequality and spatial patterns of opportunity. Further research into this type of entrepreneurship is recommended.

Small Business Economics
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Northumbria University (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Entrepreneurship for the rural? A reflection on rural entrepreneurship in a time of multi-crisis — Gary Bosworth, Johan Gaddefors, et al. · Small Business Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS