A Two-Step Method Based on lz* for Identifying Effortful Respondents

The likelihood-based person-fit statistic, lz*, is commonly used in educational assessments to distinguish between respondents who are putting in effort and those who are not. However, lz* depends on the estimated item parameters. Item parameter estimates based on data containing non-effortful respondents are biased, thereby undermining the strength of lz*. To address this issue, we propose a two-step method that leverages data mining techniques to obtain more accurate item parameter estimates and then uses them to compute lz*. The results show that the estimates based on the effortful group identified by K-means are more accurate, which improves the performance of lz* in terms of the precision of identifying effortful respondents when non-effort severity is high.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligence
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14020030
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Two-Step Method Based on lz* for Identifying Effortful Respondents

Yilan Chen, Yue Liu, Hongyun Liu
Journal of Intelligence
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

A Two-Step Method Based on lz* for Identifying Effortful Respondents

Yilan Chen, Yue Liu, Hongyun Liu
article en

Abstract

The likelihood-based person-fit statistic, lz*, is commonly used in educational assessments to distinguish between respondents who are putting in effort and those who are not. However, lz* depends on the estimated item parameters. Item parameter estimates based on data containing non-effortful respondents are biased, thereby undermining the strength of lz*. To address this issue, we propose a two-step method that leverages data mining techniques to obtain more accurate item parameter estimates and then uses them to compute lz*. The results show that the estimates based on the effortful group identified by K-means are more accurate, which improves the performance of lz* in terms of the precision of identifying effortful respondents when non-effort severity is high.

Journal of IntelligenceVol. 14(2)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Sichuan Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.