Poster Session I - A101 HOW SOON IS NECESSARY? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW & META-ANALYSIS OF SURVEILLANCE INTERVALS AFTER RESECTION OF ≥ 3 NON-ADVANCED ADENOMAS

Abstract Background Extending surveillance intervals for patients with > 3 small non-advanced adenomas (NAAs) is increasingly recommended, yet this trend is supported by systematic reviews using inappropriate comparator groups (polyp-free patients, general population) rather than comparisons of different intervals. Aims This first systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) compares surveillance intervals in adults with a baseline finding of > 3 small NAAs. Methods This SRMA was conducted to inform the CAG post-polypectomy surveillance guideline. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to March 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing predefined surveillance intervals (<3 vs. 4–5 years, <5 vs. 6–10 years, <6 vs. 7–10 years, <10 vs. >10 years). Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Primary outcomes were colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Secondary outcomes included CRC stage, adverse events, all-cause mortality, and advanced adenoma (AA) incidence. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by Chi2 (P < 0.15) and I2 tests (>25%). We assessed the certainty of evidence (CoE) with the GRADE approach. Results From 3086 citations, 4 cohort studies (3 retrospective, 1 prospective) were included. No RCTs were identified. A dose-response relationship was observed: shorter surveillance intervals were associated with lower risks of CRC and AA across all comparisons (Table 1). The CoE for all outcomes was very low due to serious risk of bias and serious indirectness. Conclusions Shorter surveillance intervals significantly reduce CRC and AA risks in patients with ≥3 small NAAs, supporting intensive surveillance and challenging prolonged intervals. Future research should identify higher-risk subgroups for personalized strategies. Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.101
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session I - A101 HOW SOON IS NECESSARY? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW & META-ANALYSIS OF SURVEILLANCE INTERVALS AFTER RESECTION OF ≥ 3 NON-ADVANCED ADENOMAS

Frances Tse, N Forbes, G Leontiadis, H AlAwadhi et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Poster Session I - A101 HOW SOON IS NECESSARY? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW & META-ANALYSIS OF SURVEILLANCE INTERVALS AFTER RESECTION OF ≥ 3 NON-ADVANCED ADENOMAS

Frances Tse, N Forbes, G Leontiadis, H AlAwadhi, Y Yuan, N Chang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Extending surveillance intervals for patients with > 3 small non-advanced adenomas (NAAs) is increasingly recommended, yet this trend is supported by systematic reviews using inappropriate comparator groups (polyp-free patients, general population) rather than comparisons of different intervals. Aims This first systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) compares surveillance intervals in adults with a baseline finding of > 3 small NAAs. Methods This SRMA was conducted to inform the CAG post-polypectomy surveillance guideline. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to March 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing predefined surveillance intervals (<3 vs. 4–5 years, <5 vs. 6–10 years, <6 vs. 7–10 years, <10 vs. >10 years). Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Primary outcomes were colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Secondary outcomes included CRC stage, adverse events, all-cause mortality, and advanced adenoma (AA) incidence. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by Chi2 (P < 0.15) and I2 tests (>25%). We assessed the certainty of evidence (CoE) with the GRADE approach. Results From 3086 citations, 4 cohort studies (3 retrospective, 1 prospective) were included. No RCTs were identified. A dose-response relationship was observed: shorter surveillance intervals were associated with lower risks of CRC and AA across all comparisons (Table 1). The CoE for all outcomes was very low due to serious risk of bias and serious indirectness. Conclusions Shorter surveillance intervals significantly reduce CRC and AA risks in patients with ≥3 small NAAs, supporting intensive surveillance and challenging prolonged intervals. Future research should identify higher-risk subgroups for personalized strategies. Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
University of Calgary (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.