Time-Dependent Volumetric and Porosity Changes of Bioceramic, Silicone Bioactive Glass-Based, and Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Micro-CT Analysis

To evaluate and compare volumetric changes in sealers and porosity of root canals filled with bioceramic, silicone bioactive glass-based, and epoxy resin-based sealers over 60 days.Eighty extracted mandibular premolars were instrumented with ProTaper Next files (size 40/06) and randomly assigned to five groups (<i>n</i> = 16), each canal filled with one of the following sealers: AH Plus Jet (AHP Jet), GuttaFlow Bioseal (GFB), CeraSeal (CS), EndoSequence BC (ES BC), and AH Plus Bioceramic (AHP Bioceramic). All canals were obturated using the matched single-cone technique. The change in sealer volume and porosity was assessed by micro-CT (<i>n</i> = 10/group) at 2, 30, and 60 days post-obturation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluated interfacial adaptation at each time point (<i>n</i> = 2/group/time).Sealer volumetric changes, open, and total pores were normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA evaluated the interaction between sealer type and post-obturation time on sealer volumetric change and porosity. One-way ANOVA compared differences among sealers at each time point. Changes within each sealer over time were assessed using paired <i>t</i>-tests for two time points or repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests for comparisons involving three time points. Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests analyzed the closed pores.After setting, AHP Jet exhibited volumetric shrinkage, whereas bioceramic and silicone bioactive glass-based sealers showed volumetric expansion; however, statistically significant volumetric changes beyond 30 days were observed only for GFB (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Regarding porosity, bioceramic and bioactive glass-based sealers demonstrated significant reductions from 2 to 30 days (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with reductions observed across all time points in GFB (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas AHP Jet showed a significant increase over time (<i>p</i> < 0.05). SEM showed good sealer-dentine adaptation, and a more homogeneous interface was found in GFB and bioceramic sealers over time.Within the limitations of this study, bioceramic and silicone bioactive glass-based sealers showed volumetric expansion and reduced porosity after obturation, whereas the epoxy resin-based sealer exhibited volumetric shrinkage with increased porosity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Dentistry
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1816538
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time-Dependent Volumetric and Porosity Changes of Bioceramic, Silicone Bioactive Glass-Based, and Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Micro-CT Analysis

Chantida Pawaputanon Na Mahasarakham, Angsana Jainaen, Kanet Chotvorrarak, Thanh Quang Nguyen et al.
European Journal of Dentistry
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Time-Dependent Volumetric and Porosity Changes of Bioceramic, Silicone Bioactive Glass-Based, and Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Micro-CT Analysis

Chantida Pawaputanon Na Mahasarakham, Angsana Jainaen, Kanet Chotvorrarak, Thanh Quang Nguyen, Pinpana Thaweesit
article en

Abstract

To evaluate and compare volumetric changes in sealers and porosity of root canals filled with bioceramic, silicone bioactive glass-based, and epoxy resin-based sealers over 60 days.Eighty extracted mandibular premolars were instrumented with ProTaper Next files (size 40/06) and randomly assigned to five groups (<i>n</i> = 16), each canal filled with one of the following sealers: AH Plus Jet (AHP Jet), GuttaFlow Bioseal (GFB), CeraSeal (CS), EndoSequence BC (ES BC), and AH Plus Bioceramic (AHP Bioceramic). All canals were obturated using the matched single-cone technique. The change in sealer volume and porosity was assessed by micro-CT (<i>n</i> = 10/group) at 2, 30, and 60 days post-obturation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluated interfacial adaptation at each time point (<i>n</i> = 2/group/time).Sealer volumetric changes, open, and total pores were normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA evaluated the interaction between sealer type and post-obturation time on sealer volumetric change and porosity. One-way ANOVA compared differences among sealers at each time point. Changes within each sealer over time were assessed using paired <i>t</i>-tests for two time points or repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests for comparisons involving three time points. Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests analyzed the closed pores.After setting, AHP Jet exhibited volumetric shrinkage, whereas bioceramic and silicone bioactive glass-based sealers showed volumetric expansion; however, statistically significant volumetric changes beyond 30 days were observed only for GFB (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Regarding porosity, bioceramic and bioactive glass-based sealers demonstrated significant reductions from 2 to 30 days (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with reductions observed across all time points in GFB (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas AHP Jet showed a significant increase over time (<i>p</i> < 0.05). SEM showed good sealer-dentine adaptation, and a more homogeneous interface was found in GFB and bioceramic sealers over time.Within the limitations of this study, bioceramic and silicone bioactive glass-based sealers showed volumetric expansion and reduced porosity after obturation, whereas the epoxy resin-based sealer exhibited volumetric shrinkage with increased porosity.

European Journal of Dentistry
Khon Kaen University (TH), Mahidol University (TH), Tra Vinh University (VN)
Trường Đại học Trà Vinh, Khon Kaen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.