Comparative assessment of propeller noise prediction methods against flyover data

This study presents a noise prediction toolchain for propeller aircraft, specifically designed for application in early preliminary design phases. Thereby, novel propeller aircraft designs can be provided with low-noise capabilities, and optimal landing and takeoff trajectories as well as the impact on the communities of such aircraft can be investigated. Two aerodynamic modeling approaches for propeller load prediction are compared: a simple blade element method and a full 3D aerodynamic model. This data is furthermore processed and provided as input for the noise prediction. Based on these results, the study evaluates tonal noise predictions from Hanson’s and Farassat’s models against flyover noise measurements of a Do 228 aircraft under various operating conditions. The comprehensive study assesses model performances across different velocity regimes. Key findings reveal that unweighted maximum sound pressure levels increase with both airspeed and rotational speed. Flight speed significantly influences the radial position of the thrust peak, shifting it outward from approximately 65–85% of the blade radius as speed increases. However, this outward shift does not significantly affect tonal noise emission. While both noise models successfully predict the velocity trend, simulations consistently underpredict noise levels by 3 dB to 5 dB compared to experimental data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CEAS Aeronautical Journal
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-026-00945-3
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of propeller noise prediction methods against flyover data

Vincent Domogalla, Antje Feldhusen-Hoffmann, Jatin Manghnani
CEAS Aeronautical Journal
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
article

Comparative assessment of propeller noise prediction methods against flyover data

Vincent Domogalla, Antje Feldhusen-Hoffmann, Jatin Manghnani
article en

Abstract

This study presents a noise prediction toolchain for propeller aircraft, specifically designed for application in early preliminary design phases. Thereby, novel propeller aircraft designs can be provided with low-noise capabilities, and optimal landing and takeoff trajectories as well as the impact on the communities of such aircraft can be investigated. Two aerodynamic modeling approaches for propeller load prediction are compared: a simple blade element method and a full 3D aerodynamic model. This data is furthermore processed and provided as input for the noise prediction. Based on these results, the study evaluates tonal noise predictions from Hanson’s and Farassat’s models against flyover noise measurements of a Do 228 aircraft under various operating conditions. The comprehensive study assesses model performances across different velocity regimes. Key findings reveal that unweighted maximum sound pressure levels increase with both airspeed and rotational speed. Flight speed significantly influences the radial position of the thrust peak, shifting it outward from approximately 65–85% of the blade radius as speed increases. However, this outward shift does not significantly affect tonal noise emission. While both noise models successfully predict the velocity trend, simulations consistently underpredict noise levels by 3 dB to 5 dB compared to experimental data.

CEAS Aeronautical Journal
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.