Poster Session II - A278 HIGHER BMI DOES NOT IMPAIR VISUALIZATION OF BOWEL SEGMENTS OR ANASTOMOSES IN INTESTINAL ULTRASOUND

Abstract Background Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive, point-of-care tool to assess disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Bowel wall thickness (BWT) is among the most reliable markers of active inflammation. A longstanding concern is that higher body mass index (BMI) may impair visualization due to increased abdominal wall thickness and beam attenuation, however, data quantifying the effect of BMI on IUS performance in IBD are limited. Aims We aimed to assess whether BMI affects bowel visualization in clinical IUS practice. Methods We retrospectively analyzed IUS scans at a tertiary IBD center (August 2021-August 2025). Successful visualization was defined by the ability to obtain a BWT measurement. Scans were acquired by three experienced bowel sonographers using standardized protocols. Rectal visualization was assessed in a predefined subgroup (n = 135). Visualization rates of bowel segment and BMI category (<18, 18–25, 25–30, ≥30 kg/m2) were compared using the Freeman-Halton test. Results 748 scans from 516 patients (median age 43 years [IQR 32-59], 50% female, median BMI 24.9 [22.1–28.6]) were included. Among those with native anatomy (n = 589), the terminal ileum (TI), colonic segments, and rectum were visualized consistently across BMI groups with no significant difference. Among patients with prior ileocecal resection (n = 159), there was no significant difference in anastomosis visualization across BMI groups (p = 0.051). In patients with ileal Crohn’s disease (n = 269), TI visualization was >93.6% across all BMI groups (p = 0.63). In IBD patients without ileal disease (n = 318), visualization did not differ significantly across BMI groups (p = 0.15). However, a significant difference was observed in the overweight group between IBD cases involving the TI and those sparing it (97.7% vs 85.5%, p = 0.005). Analysis using only the last scan per patient (n = 516) confirmed these findings. Conclusions IUS visualization of bowel segments and anastomoses was consistent across BMI categories. Visualization was more influenced by disease location than BMI, underscoring the robustness of IUS across body habitus. A278 Table 1: IUS Visualization by BMI Category Funding Agencies: None, NRC

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.277
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session II - A278 HIGHER BMI DOES NOT IMPAIR VISUALIZATION OF BOWEL SEGMENTS OR ANASTOMOSES IN INTESTINAL ULTRASOUND

Brooke Maracle, J Besney, Deepan Hazra, R Ingram et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Poster Session II - A278 HIGHER BMI DOES NOT IMPAIR VISUALIZATION OF BOWEL SEGMENTS OR ANASTOMOSES IN INTESTINAL ULTRASOUND

Brooke Maracle, J Besney, Deepan Hazra, R Ingram, Rohita Reji, G G Kaplan, C Lu, J St-Pierre, A AlDarwish, R Panaccione, C Ma, C Seow, K Novak
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive, point-of-care tool to assess disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Bowel wall thickness (BWT) is among the most reliable markers of active inflammation. A longstanding concern is that higher body mass index (BMI) may impair visualization due to increased abdominal wall thickness and beam attenuation, however, data quantifying the effect of BMI on IUS performance in IBD are limited. Aims We aimed to assess whether BMI affects bowel visualization in clinical IUS practice. Methods We retrospectively analyzed IUS scans at a tertiary IBD center (August 2021-August 2025). Successful visualization was defined by the ability to obtain a BWT measurement. Scans were acquired by three experienced bowel sonographers using standardized protocols. Rectal visualization was assessed in a predefined subgroup (n = 135). Visualization rates of bowel segment and BMI category (<18, 18–25, 25–30, ≥30 kg/m2) were compared using the Freeman-Halton test. Results 748 scans from 516 patients (median age 43 years [IQR 32-59], 50% female, median BMI 24.9 [22.1–28.6]) were included. Among those with native anatomy (n = 589), the terminal ileum (TI), colonic segments, and rectum were visualized consistently across BMI groups with no significant difference. Among patients with prior ileocecal resection (n = 159), there was no significant difference in anastomosis visualization across BMI groups (p = 0.051). In patients with ileal Crohn’s disease (n = 269), TI visualization was >93.6% across all BMI groups (p = 0.63). In IBD patients without ileal disease (n = 318), visualization did not differ significantly across BMI groups (p = 0.15). However, a significant difference was observed in the overweight group between IBD cases involving the TI and those sparing it (97.7% vs 85.5%, p = 0.005). Analysis using only the last scan per patient (n = 516) confirmed these findings. Conclusions IUS visualization of bowel segments and anastomoses was consistent across BMI categories. Visualization was more influenced by disease location than BMI, underscoring the robustness of IUS across body habitus. A278 Table 1: IUS Visualization by BMI Category Funding Agencies: None, NRC

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
University of Calgary (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.