Experimental Aircraft: Comparative Analysis of Governance, Funding, and Business Models

Decarbonizing aviation, particularly for long-range operations, is critical for meeting international climate targets, yet it remains technically and operationally challenging. Experimental aircraft (EA) serve to enable flying research infrastructures that provide realistic flight environments for validating emerging technologies and bridging the gap between research and future operational aircraft. While motivated by long-range aviation decarbonization, the study analyses experimental aircraft across multiple scales and missions, focusing on governance structures, funding mechanisms, and business models rather than technical performance metrics. Beyond their technical role, the success and sustainability of EA programs depend strongly on how they are governed, financed, and operated—dimensions that remain comparatively underexplored in the literature, which has primarily emphasized technical performance and flight-test results. To address this gap, this study adopts a structured, multi-method qualitative research approach combining desk-based investigation, a systematic literature review, and comparative case study analysis. The paper reviews and classifies 74 experimental aircraft programs worldwide, with a primary analytical focus on Europe and the United States, examining governance models, funding structures, and business models alongside contextual factors such as platform scale, sectoral orientation, and stakeholder involvement. The results show that most experimental aircraft function as technology demonstration and strategic innovation platforms, supported predominantly by public and public–private funding due to the high-risk and long-term nature of flight research infrastructures. Governance arrangements vary with mission and scale, balancing public oversight, industrial leadership, and academic participation. These findings support the EXAELIA project and provide a reference framework for future experimental aircraft programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13020181
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Aircraft: Comparative Analysis of Governance, Funding, and Business Models

Lorenzo Pellone, Dionysios Markatos, Pierluigi Iannelli, Angelos Filippatos et al.
Aerospace
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
article

Experimental Aircraft: Comparative Analysis of Governance, Funding, and Business Models

Lorenzo Pellone, Dionysios Markatos, Pierluigi Iannelli, Angelos Filippatos, Andreas Strohmayer, Harry O. Psihoyos, Thomas Kalampoukas, Spiros Pantelakis, Marco Armbrust
article en

Abstract

Decarbonizing aviation, particularly for long-range operations, is critical for meeting international climate targets, yet it remains technically and operationally challenging. Experimental aircraft (EA) serve to enable flying research infrastructures that provide realistic flight environments for validating emerging technologies and bridging the gap between research and future operational aircraft. While motivated by long-range aviation decarbonization, the study analyses experimental aircraft across multiple scales and missions, focusing on governance structures, funding mechanisms, and business models rather than technical performance metrics. Beyond their technical role, the success and sustainability of EA programs depend strongly on how they are governed, financed, and operated—dimensions that remain comparatively underexplored in the literature, which has primarily emphasized technical performance and flight-test results. To address this gap, this study adopts a structured, multi-method qualitative research approach combining desk-based investigation, a systematic literature review, and comparative case study analysis. The paper reviews and classifies 74 experimental aircraft programs worldwide, with a primary analytical focus on Europe and the United States, examining governance models, funding structures, and business models alongside contextual factors such as platform scale, sectoral orientation, and stakeholder involvement. The results show that most experimental aircraft function as technology demonstration and strategic innovation platforms, supported predominantly by public and public–private funding due to the high-risk and long-term nature of flight research infrastructures. Governance arrangements vary with mission and scale, balancing public oversight, industrial leadership, and academic participation. These findings support the EXAELIA project and provide a reference framework for future experimental aircraft programs.

AerospaceVol. 13(2)
University of Stuttgart (DE), University of Patras (GR), Italian Aerospace Research Centre (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.