Trust but not trustworthy? The bankruptcy of Sichuan Trust

The bankruptcy of Sichuan Trust Co., Ltd. (Sichuan Trust) highlights critical vulnerabilities faced by retail investors within China’s shadow banking sector, arising primarily from limited transparency and inadequate regulatory protections. This paper examines the Sichuan Trust case to explore retail investor vulnerability and to identify regulatory gaps. The paper contends that, while ex post regulatory interventions have facilitated partial restitution for retail investors through structured repayment schemes, the existing ex ante safeguards remain insufficient to prevent such harm in the first place. Drawing from this analysis, the paper advocates for a more proactive regulatory approach emphasising preventive measures, strengthened disclosures, enhanced financial literacy education, and targeted paternalistic protections to ensure retail investor welfare at the pre-investment stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Financial Markets Review
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2026.2626880
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust but not trustworthy? The bankruptcy of Sichuan Trust

Chen Yang
Law and Financial Markets Review
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Trust but not trustworthy? The bankruptcy of Sichuan Trust

Chen Yang
article en

Abstract

The bankruptcy of Sichuan Trust Co., Ltd. (Sichuan Trust) highlights critical vulnerabilities faced by retail investors within China’s shadow banking sector, arising primarily from limited transparency and inadequate regulatory protections. This paper examines the Sichuan Trust case to explore retail investor vulnerability and to identify regulatory gaps. The paper contends that, while ex post regulatory interventions have facilitated partial restitution for retail investors through structured repayment schemes, the existing ex ante safeguards remain insufficient to prevent such harm in the first place. Drawing from this analysis, the paper advocates for a more proactive regulatory approach emphasising preventive measures, strengthened disclosures, enhanced financial literacy education, and targeted paternalistic protections to ensure retail investor welfare at the pre-investment stage.

Law and Financial Markets Review
University of Kent (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.