Accurate inference on a parameter of interest via parametric bootstrap in two-way crossed fixed effects models with sparse discrete data

Inference on a scalar parameter in the presence of high-dimensional nuisance parameters is challenging, especially when their dimension increases with the sample size. This issue is exacerbated in models with crossed fixed effects and sparse discrete data. In this scenario, we show that standard likelihood-based methods, such as the signed likelihood root or profile likelihood, often fail to provide reliable results due to limited information. Parametric bootstrap offers an alternative to analytical corrections but it has been less explored in the context of sparse discrete data and crossed fixed effects, and its theoretical properties have yet to be fully demonstrated. For these settings, this study shows that hybrid approaches combining analytical corrections with parametric bootstrap yield superior inferential accuracy. Simulation studies indicate that constrained bootstrap from penalized estimates outperforms standard bootstrap approaches, particularly in logistic regression models with severe sparsity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Methods & Applications
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-026-00833-4
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accurate inference on a parameter of interest via parametric bootstrap in two-way crossed fixed effects models with sparse discrete data

Alessandra Salvan, Nicola Sartori, Davide Benussi
Statistical Methods & Applications
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Accurate inference on a parameter of interest via parametric bootstrap in two-way crossed fixed effects models with sparse discrete data

Alessandra Salvan, Nicola Sartori, Davide Benussi
article en

Abstract

Inference on a scalar parameter in the presence of high-dimensional nuisance parameters is challenging, especially when their dimension increases with the sample size. This issue is exacerbated in models with crossed fixed effects and sparse discrete data. In this scenario, we show that standard likelihood-based methods, such as the signed likelihood root or profile likelihood, often fail to provide reliable results due to limited information. Parametric bootstrap offers an alternative to analytical corrections but it has been less explored in the context of sparse discrete data and crossed fixed effects, and its theoretical properties have yet to be fully demonstrated. For these settings, this study shows that hybrid approaches combining analytical corrections with parametric bootstrap yield superior inferential accuracy. Simulation studies indicate that constrained bootstrap from penalized estimates outperforms standard bootstrap approaches, particularly in logistic regression models with severe sparsity.

Statistical Methods & Applications
University of Padua (IT)
Università degli Studi di Padova
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.