Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for preemptive analgesia on intraoperative opioid dosage in burn patients: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Burn survivors may be at risk of various opioid-related adverse effects. We aimed to investigate whether transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) used for preemptive analgesia in burn patients reduces intraoperative opioid dosage. In this trial, 86 burn patients with wound debridement under general anesthesia were randomized to receive thirty minutes of TEAS (TEAS group, n = 43) at acupoints LI4 (Hegu), PC6 (Neiguan), ST36 (Zusanli), and SP6 (Sanyinjiao) before induction of anesthesia or false stimulation (control group, n = 43). The primary outcome was the intraoperative remifentanil dosage. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative propofol dosage, patients’ resting facial-visual analogue scale (F-VAS) scores before stimulation (F1), after stimulation (F2), at 24 h after surgery (F3), and 48 h after surgery (F4), the incidence of opioid-related adverse reactions, and the use of rescue analgesics until the first postoperative day (POD1). The dosage of remifentanil showed a significant difference between the two groups, with 0.65(0.45,1.00) in the TEAS group (T group) and 0.90(0.67,1.23) in the control group (C group) (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the intraoperative propofol dosage between groups. F2 and F3 in the T group were lower than those in the C group (P < 0.05), and no significant differences were observed in F1 and F4 (P > 0.05) between the two groups. Until POD1, the incidence of nausea-vomiting and constipation (P < 0.05) in the T group was lower than that the C group, while there was no significant difference in the incidence of drowsiness and dizziness (P > 0.05). It is worth noting that the use of rescue analgesics between the two groups was comparable (P > 0.05). The preoperative application of TEAS for preemptive analgesia can reduce intraoperative remifentanil dosage. Meanwhile, it has a positive effect on early postoperative analgesia and gastrointestinal adverse reactions. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300078615, date of registration: 14/12/2023, retrospectively registered).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perioperative Medicine
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-026-00656-7
Primary Topic
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for preemptive analgesia on intraoperative opioid dosage in burn patients: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Yujia Zhao, Qian Liu, Yan Li, George Zhang et al.
Perioperative Medicine
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
article

Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for preemptive analgesia on intraoperative opioid dosage in burn patients: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Yujia Zhao, Qian Liu, Yan Li, George Zhang, Yan Li, Haichuan He, Ziyan Pan
article en

Abstract

Burn survivors may be at risk of various opioid-related adverse effects. We aimed to investigate whether transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) used for preemptive analgesia in burn patients reduces intraoperative opioid dosage. In this trial, 86 burn patients with wound debridement under general anesthesia were randomized to receive thirty minutes of TEAS (TEAS group, n = 43) at acupoints LI4 (Hegu), PC6 (Neiguan), ST36 (Zusanli), and SP6 (Sanyinjiao) before induction of anesthesia or false stimulation (control group, n = 43). The primary outcome was the intraoperative remifentanil dosage. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative propofol dosage, patients’ resting facial-visual analogue scale (F-VAS) scores before stimulation (F1), after stimulation (F2), at 24 h after surgery (F3), and 48 h after surgery (F4), the incidence of opioid-related adverse reactions, and the use of rescue analgesics until the first postoperative day (POD1). The dosage of remifentanil showed a significant difference between the two groups, with 0.65(0.45,1.00) in the TEAS group (T group) and 0.90(0.67,1.23) in the control group (C group) (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the intraoperative propofol dosage between groups. F2 and F3 in the T group were lower than those in the C group (P < 0.05), and no significant differences were observed in F1 and F4 (P > 0.05) between the two groups. Until POD1, the incidence of nausea-vomiting and constipation (P < 0.05) in the T group was lower than that the C group, while there was no significant difference in the incidence of drowsiness and dizziness (P > 0.05). It is worth noting that the use of rescue analgesics between the two groups was comparable (P > 0.05). The preoperative application of TEAS for preemptive analgesia can reduce intraoperative remifentanil dosage. Meanwhile, it has a positive effect on early postoperative analgesia and gastrointestinal adverse reactions. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300078615, date of registration: 14/12/2023, retrospectively registered).

Perioperative MedicineVol. 15(1)
First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University Medical College (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.