Blocking the Radical Right: Evidence from Strategic Candidate Voting Against the AfD in Germany’s 2025 Federal Election

Abstract This paper examines strategic candidate voting against radical-right parties, focusing on the Alternative for Germany (AfD) in Germany’s 2025 federal election. Germany has long been considered “hard ground” for radical-right parties, yet the AfD has expanded rapidly over the past decade and, in 2025, fielded numerous highly competitive district candidates, raising concerns about potential AfD direct mandates. Against this backdrop, we investigate whether mainstream voters coordinated their candidate choices to prevent these candidates from winning. In a first study, we analyze district-level election results to assess how the strength of AfD candidates shapes patterns of candidate-vote competition. Stronger AfD contenders are associated with a lower number of effective candidates and with notable overperformance of the leading non-AfD candidate, especially in closely contested districts. In a second study, we combine district results with survey data from the German Longitudinal Election Study and estimate multilevel models to test whether voters cross partisan lines under competitive threat. The analysis confirms that voters are willing to support the most viable non-AfD candidate in districts where the AfD is particularly strong, thus providing direct evidence of strategic candidate voting at the individual level. Overall, our findings show how variation in the local strength of AfD candidates shapes strategic coordination among voters, with more competitive districts generating stronger support for the leading non-AfD alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politische Vierteljahresschrift
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-026-00648-8
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blocking the Radical Right: Evidence from Strategic Candidate Voting Against the AfD in Germany’s 2025 Federal Election

Sven Hillen, Jessica Kuhlmann
Politische Vierteljahresschrift
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Blocking the Radical Right: Evidence from Strategic Candidate Voting Against the AfD in Germany’s 2025 Federal Election

Sven Hillen, Jessica Kuhlmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines strategic candidate voting against radical-right parties, focusing on the Alternative for Germany (AfD) in Germany’s 2025 federal election. Germany has long been considered “hard ground” for radical-right parties, yet the AfD has expanded rapidly over the past decade and, in 2025, fielded numerous highly competitive district candidates, raising concerns about potential AfD direct mandates. Against this backdrop, we investigate whether mainstream voters coordinated their candidate choices to prevent these candidates from winning. In a first study, we analyze district-level election results to assess how the strength of AfD candidates shapes patterns of candidate-vote competition. Stronger AfD contenders are associated with a lower number of effective candidates and with notable overperformance of the leading non-AfD candidate, especially in closely contested districts. In a second study, we combine district results with survey data from the German Longitudinal Election Study and estimate multilevel models to test whether voters cross partisan lines under competitive threat. The analysis confirms that voters are willing to support the most viable non-AfD candidate in districts where the AfD is particularly strong, thus providing direct evidence of strategic candidate voting at the individual level. Overall, our findings show how variation in the local strength of AfD candidates shapes strategic coordination among voters, with more competitive districts generating stronger support for the leading non-AfD alternative.

Politische Vierteljahresschrift
University of Siegen (DE), Folkwang University of the Arts (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.