Investigating the impact of residual refraction within ±1.0 dioptre on uncorrected distance visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes: a cross-sectional study

The impact of refractive errors (≤1.0 D) on UDVA was associated with the magnitude and type of astigmatism. Residual astigmatism of ≥0.50 D exerted a significant negative effect on UDVA. A plano SE (0 D) was optimal for minimum and WTR astigmatism, whereas slight hyperopia yielded superior UDVA in ATR and oblique astigmatism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112890
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the impact of residual refraction within ±1.0 dioptre on uncorrected distance visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes: a cross-sectional study

Qianzhong Cao, Danmei Li, Jiaqing Zhang, Yizhi Liu et al.
BMJ Open
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Investigating the impact of residual refraction within ±1.0 dioptre on uncorrected distance visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes: a cross-sectional study

Qianzhong Cao, Danmei Li, Jiaqing Zhang, Yizhi Liu, Lie Chen, Ling Jin, Wenjia Cai, Xiaotong Han
article en

Abstract

The impact of refractive errors (≤1.0 D) on UDVA was associated with the magnitude and type of astigmatism. Residual astigmatism of ≥0.50 D exerted a significant negative effect on UDVA. A plano SE (0 D) was optimal for minimum and WTR astigmatism, whereas slight hyperopia yielded superior UDVA in ATR and oblique astigmatism.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(2)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.