China’s Three-Level Game in the Middle East: Geopolitical Constraints on a Geoeconomic Strategy

China’s growing influence in the Middle East has rekindled discussions about the longevity of the U.S.-led system and the potential for Beijing to become a pivotal state in establishing an alternative framework. This paper analyzes China’s prospects and the structural and strategic limitations that restrict its influence, framed by regional order theory and utilizing an analytical-exploratory methodology. The analysis demonstrates that China’s most effective instruments of order-building operate in the geoeconomic and geocultural spheres. Its influence in the region grows mainly through market integration, infrastructure projects, and the spread of cultural narratives. By contrast, Beijing’s main weaknesses appear in the areas of geopolitics and security. Its strict policy of non-interference and dependence on the U.S.-led security system limits its ability to take full regional leadership. In this sense, China’s Middle Eastern engagement reflects both the strength of its economic and cultural resources and the fragility of its geopolitical posture, illuminating the paradox of a rising power whose capacity to project influence remains confined by structural and normative limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of International Review
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2630531326500046
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s Three-Level Game in the Middle East: Geopolitical Constraints on a Geoeconomic Strategy

Bahram P. Kalviri
Chinese Journal of International Review
Belt and Road Initiative
article

China’s Three-Level Game in the Middle East: Geopolitical Constraints on a Geoeconomic Strategy

Bahram P. Kalviri
article en

Abstract

China’s growing influence in the Middle East has rekindled discussions about the longevity of the U.S.-led system and the potential for Beijing to become a pivotal state in establishing an alternative framework. This paper analyzes China’s prospects and the structural and strategic limitations that restrict its influence, framed by regional order theory and utilizing an analytical-exploratory methodology. The analysis demonstrates that China’s most effective instruments of order-building operate in the geoeconomic and geocultural spheres. Its influence in the region grows mainly through market integration, infrastructure projects, and the spread of cultural narratives. By contrast, Beijing’s main weaknesses appear in the areas of geopolitics and security. Its strict policy of non-interference and dependence on the U.S.-led security system limits its ability to take full regional leadership. In this sense, China’s Middle Eastern engagement reflects both the strength of its economic and cultural resources and the fragility of its geopolitical posture, illuminating the paradox of a rising power whose capacity to project influence remains confined by structural and normative limitations.

Chinese Journal of International Review
University of Hyderabad (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China’s Three-Level Game in the Middle East: Geopolitical Constraints on a Geoeconomic Strategy — Bahram P. Kalviri · Chinese Journal of International Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS