What Is at Stake? The Co-Encoding/Decoding Model of Human–Generative Artificial Intelligence Communication

This article introduces the co-encoding/decoding (co-en/de) model to theorize the stakes of human–Generative AI (GenAI) communication. Extending Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding framework, the model conceptualizes human–GenAI interactions as recursive circuits of meaning-making. Through a typology of co-encoding and decoding modes, this article identifies how these interactions feed back into three core conditions of subjectivity—knowledge, agency, and power infrastructures—ultimately shaping the relational ontology of human actors and GenAI systems. We argue that 2 emergent hybrid subjectivities are formed on a fluid spectrum, from the Android, a diminished human subject shaped by machinic hegemony, to the Cyborg, an augmented subjectivity that fosters resistance and democratic agency. By moving beyond techno-determinist and institutionalist accounts, this study offers a relational, critical framework for understanding how GenAI systems mediate discourse and subject formation. It concludes by outlining the conditions under which counter-hegemonic human–GenAI interactions may emerge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of communication
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65476/1sxwvg58
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is at Stake? The Co-Encoding/Decoding Model of Human–Generative Artificial Intelligence Communication

Henry Snowball, Ben O'Loughlin, Marco Guglielmo
International journal of communication
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

What Is at Stake? The Co-Encoding/Decoding Model of Human–Generative Artificial Intelligence Communication

Henry Snowball, Ben O'Loughlin, Marco Guglielmo
article en

Abstract

This article introduces the co-encoding/decoding (co-en/de) model to theorize the stakes of human–Generative AI (GenAI) communication. Extending Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding framework, the model conceptualizes human–GenAI interactions as recursive circuits of meaning-making. Through a typology of co-encoding and decoding modes, this article identifies how these interactions feed back into three core conditions of subjectivity—knowledge, agency, and power infrastructures—ultimately shaping the relational ontology of human actors and GenAI systems. We argue that 2 emergent hybrid subjectivities are formed on a fluid spectrum, from the Android, a diminished human subject shaped by machinic hegemony, to the Cyborg, an augmented subjectivity that fosters resistance and democratic agency. By moving beyond techno-determinist and institutionalist accounts, this study offers a relational, critical framework for understanding how GenAI systems mediate discourse and subject formation. It concludes by outlining the conditions under which counter-hegemonic human–GenAI interactions may emerge.

International journal of communicationVol. 20
Universitat de València (ES), Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
European Commission
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Is at Stake? The Co-Encoding/Decoding Model of Human–Generative Artificial Intelligence Communication — Henry Snowball, Ben O'Loughlin, et al. · International journal of communication (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS