Poster Session II - A232 AZATHIOPRINE DOSE THRESHOLD IN ANTI TNF COMBINATION THERAPY FOR MINIMIZING IMMUNOGENICITY IN IBD: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background Prior studies suggest similar outcomes with low (<2 mg/kg/day) versus standard (≥2 mg/kg/day) azathioprine (AZA) when combined with TNF α inhibitors (TNFi), but many did not account for pharmacogenetics. Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and HLA DQA1*05G>A variants influence AZA exposure and anti drug antibody (ADA) risk, potentially confounding apparent dose effects. Aims To compare low versus standard dose AZA in IBD patients on combination TNFi for ADA and key clinical outcomes, while adjusting for clinical and genetic covariates. Methods Single center retrospective cohort of adults with IBD receiving AZA plus infliximab or adalimumab from induction through maintenance. Only participants with a wildtype TPMT status were included in the adjusted analyses. Groups: low dose (<2 mg/kg/day) vs standard dose (≥2 mg/kg/day). The primary outcome ADA formation. Secondary outcomes included TNFi discontinuation, loss of response (LOR), and adverse drug events (ADEs). Multivariable analysis, reported as Odd ratios or hazard ratios, where appropriate, were adjusted for age, sex, IBD type, TNFi type, and HLA DQA1*05G>A genotype. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis tested for a weight based AZA threshold associated with ADA formation. Results A total of 119 participants (low n = 68; standard n = 51) are included in the analyses. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between participants receiving low versus standard dose AZA. Median follow up time was 35 months. Adjusted analyses in TPMT wildtype participants showed no increased TNFi ADA risk with standard vs low dose AZA (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.78–1.81; p = 0.44). Ther was no difference in the incidence of TNFi discontinuation (HR 0.68; 0.31–1.50; p = 0.34), LOR (OR 1.40; 0.61–3.32; p = 0.44), or ADEs (OR 0.93; 0.37–2.40; p = 0.87). ROC analysis did not identify a discriminative weight based threshold for ADA formation (AUC 0.53; 95% CI 0.39–0.67; p = 0.65). Conclusions To date, low dose AZA performed comparably to standard dose AZA across ADA, discontinuation, LOR, and ADEs after adjustment for HLA DQA1*05G>A genotype and clinical factors in participants receiving combination TNFi therapy for IBD. No clinically useful weight based AZA threshold for ADA was identified, supporting flexible AZA dosing in TPMT wildtype patients. A232 Table 1: Univariate analyses Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.231
Primary Topic
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session II - A232 AZATHIOPRINE DOSE THRESHOLD IN ANTI TNF COMBINATION THERAPY FOR MINIMIZING IMMUNOGENICITY IN IBD: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Reena Khanna, Aze Wilson, J Choi, N Alajeel
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
article

Poster Session II - A232 AZATHIOPRINE DOSE THRESHOLD IN ANTI TNF COMBINATION THERAPY FOR MINIMIZING IMMUNOGENICITY IN IBD: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Reena Khanna, Aze Wilson, J Choi, N Alajeel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Prior studies suggest similar outcomes with low (<2 mg/kg/day) versus standard (≥2 mg/kg/day) azathioprine (AZA) when combined with TNF α inhibitors (TNFi), but many did not account for pharmacogenetics. Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and HLA DQA1*05G>A variants influence AZA exposure and anti drug antibody (ADA) risk, potentially confounding apparent dose effects. Aims To compare low versus standard dose AZA in IBD patients on combination TNFi for ADA and key clinical outcomes, while adjusting for clinical and genetic covariates. Methods Single center retrospective cohort of adults with IBD receiving AZA plus infliximab or adalimumab from induction through maintenance. Only participants with a wildtype TPMT status were included in the adjusted analyses. Groups: low dose (<2 mg/kg/day) vs standard dose (≥2 mg/kg/day). The primary outcome ADA formation. Secondary outcomes included TNFi discontinuation, loss of response (LOR), and adverse drug events (ADEs). Multivariable analysis, reported as Odd ratios or hazard ratios, where appropriate, were adjusted for age, sex, IBD type, TNFi type, and HLA DQA1*05G>A genotype. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis tested for a weight based AZA threshold associated with ADA formation. Results A total of 119 participants (low n = 68; standard n = 51) are included in the analyses. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between participants receiving low versus standard dose AZA. Median follow up time was 35 months. Adjusted analyses in TPMT wildtype participants showed no increased TNFi ADA risk with standard vs low dose AZA (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.78–1.81; p = 0.44). Ther was no difference in the incidence of TNFi discontinuation (HR 0.68; 0.31–1.50; p = 0.34), LOR (OR 1.40; 0.61–3.32; p = 0.44), or ADEs (OR 0.93; 0.37–2.40; p = 0.87). ROC analysis did not identify a discriminative weight based threshold for ADA formation (AUC 0.53; 95% CI 0.39–0.67; p = 0.65). Conclusions To date, low dose AZA performed comparably to standard dose AZA across ADA, discontinuation, LOR, and ADEs after adjustment for HLA DQA1*05G>A genotype and clinical factors in participants receiving combination TNFi therapy for IBD. No clinically useful weight based AZA threshold for ADA was identified, supporting flexible AZA dosing in TPMT wildtype patients. A232 Table 1: Univariate analyses Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
London Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.