Poster Session I - A48 DIGITAL MICROSCOPY IN THE ENDOSCOPY SUITE: A REFERENCE STANDARD FOR COLORECTAL POLYP SIZE MEASUREMENT

Abstract Background Accurate determination of colorectal polyp size is critical for surveillance recommendations and for generating reliable ground truth in artificial intelligence (AI) development. Visual estimation during endoscopy is imprecise, and no validated reference standard exists. Aims We aimed to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of real-time digital microscopic measurement of fresh polypectomy specimens. Methods In this prospective study at the Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), 70 polyps from 44 patients (mean age 65.4 years; 52.3% female) were measured on-site using a calibrated digital microscope. Three independent raters, blinded to each other, obtained long- and short-axis measurements. The primary outcome was inter-rater reliability for long-axis measurements. Secondary outcomes included short-axis reliability, overall agreement, and classification (≤5 mm vs. >5 mm). Results Of the included lesions, 65.7% were adenomas, 14.3% hyperplastic, and 10.0% inflammatory. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for both long-axis (ICC 0.941, 95% CI 0.914–0.961) and short-axis (ICC 0.943, 95% CI 0.917–0.962) measurements. Bland–Altman plots demonstrated mean differences close to zero across all rater pairs, without systematic bias. Limits of agreement were within ±1 mm. When dichotomized at the 5 mm threshold, agreement was perfect (κ = 1.0). Conclusions On-site digital microscopic measurement of fresh polyps provides highly reproducible, unbiased, and verifiable size data with photographic documentation. This method should be considered the reference standard for establishing accurate ground truth datasets in the development and validation of AI-assisted polyp sizing models. A47 Table 1: Polyp characteristics Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.048
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session I - A48 DIGITAL MICROSCOPY IN THE ENDOSCOPY SUITE: A REFERENCE STANDARD FOR COLORECTAL POLYP SIZE MEASUREMENT

Roupen Djinbachian, Victoire Michal, Neal Shahidi, Preslava Aleksieva et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Poster Session I - A48 DIGITAL MICROSCOPY IN THE ENDOSCOPY SUITE: A REFERENCE STANDARD FOR COLORECTAL POLYP SIZE MEASUREMENT

Roupen Djinbachian, Victoire Michal, Neal Shahidi, Preslava Aleksieva, Megan Oleksiw, Eric Cristea, Mohamed Zineddine Mahdadi, D Von Renteln, H Pohl, C Gefflot, S Mitchell, D K Rex
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Accurate determination of colorectal polyp size is critical for surveillance recommendations and for generating reliable ground truth in artificial intelligence (AI) development. Visual estimation during endoscopy is imprecise, and no validated reference standard exists. Aims We aimed to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of real-time digital microscopic measurement of fresh polypectomy specimens. Methods In this prospective study at the Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), 70 polyps from 44 patients (mean age 65.4 years; 52.3% female) were measured on-site using a calibrated digital microscope. Three independent raters, blinded to each other, obtained long- and short-axis measurements. The primary outcome was inter-rater reliability for long-axis measurements. Secondary outcomes included short-axis reliability, overall agreement, and classification (≤5 mm vs. >5 mm). Results Of the included lesions, 65.7% were adenomas, 14.3% hyperplastic, and 10.0% inflammatory. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for both long-axis (ICC 0.941, 95% CI 0.914–0.961) and short-axis (ICC 0.943, 95% CI 0.917–0.962) measurements. Bland–Altman plots demonstrated mean differences close to zero across all rater pairs, without systematic bias. Limits of agreement were within ±1 mm. When dichotomized at the 5 mm threshold, agreement was perfect (κ = 1.0). Conclusions On-site digital microscopic measurement of fresh polyps provides highly reproducible, unbiased, and verifiable size data with photographic documentation. This method should be considered the reference standard for establishing accurate ground truth datasets in the development and validation of AI-assisted polyp sizing models. A47 Table 1: Polyp characteristics Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
Dartmouth College (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.