Breaking Down Inequality: Can Taxes Really be Redistributive?

This study examines the redistributive effects of tax system compositions across 107 countries from 1990 to 2020, using multiple econometric techniques and robustness checks to assess both short- and long-term dynamics. By stratifying countries by income levels and incorporating measures of tax effort, progressivity, and inequality quartiles, the analysis provides a detailed view of fiscal redistribution. Results show strong temporal persistence and relative support for the median voter hypothesis in high- and middle-income economies. Economic growth and informality negatively affect redistribution, while unemployment has income-specific impacts. Tax structure is central: PIT and SSC are most effective in high- and middle-income countries, while CIT and indirect taxes dominate in low-income economies. Structural progressivity enhances redistribution across all groups, and tax effort is particularly impactful in low-income countries. These findings highlight the importance of appropriate tax policy and fiscal capacity in achieving sustained redistribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Finance Review
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421261417427
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking Down Inequality: Can Taxes Really be Redistributive?

Lucas Menescal
Public Finance Review
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

Breaking Down Inequality: Can Taxes Really be Redistributive?

Lucas Menescal
article en

Abstract

This study examines the redistributive effects of tax system compositions across 107 countries from 1990 to 2020, using multiple econometric techniques and robustness checks to assess both short- and long-term dynamics. By stratifying countries by income levels and incorporating measures of tax effort, progressivity, and inequality quartiles, the analysis provides a detailed view of fiscal redistribution. Results show strong temporal persistence and relative support for the median voter hypothesis in high- and middle-income economies. Economic growth and informality negatively affect redistribution, while unemployment has income-specific impacts. Tax structure is central: PIT and SSC are most effective in high- and middle-income countries, while CIT and indirect taxes dominate in low-income economies. Structural progressivity enhances redistribution across all groups, and tax effort is particularly impactful in low-income countries. These findings highlight the importance of appropriate tax policy and fiscal capacity in achieving sustained redistribution.

Public Finance ReviewVol. 54(3)
University of Lisbon (PT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Breaking Down Inequality: Can Taxes Really be Redistributive? — Lucas Menescal · Public Finance Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS