Comparative Study Between Adjuvant Perineal Block and Spinal Anaesthesia Alone for Post-haemorrhoidectomy Pain Control

<i>Background: </i>Severe postoperative pain is common after haemorrhoidectomy and can delay recovery and discharge. While spinal anaesthesia provides good intraoperative analgesia, its postoperative effect is short-lived. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of an adjuvant perineal block combined with spinal anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia alone for postoperative pain control. <i>Methods:</i> In this randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 68 patients (ASA I–III) scheduled for elective open haemorrhoidectomy were assigned into two groups:<i> </i>Group A (Block Group): spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine followed by posterior perineal block using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine;<i> </i>Group B (Control Group): spinal anaesthesia alone.<i> </i>Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2, 12, 24 and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included time to first rescue analgesic, total opioid consumption, urinary retention, nausea/vomiting, and patient satisfaction.<i> Results: </i>Patients in Group A had significantly lower mean VAS scores at all postoperative intervals, with the greatest difference at 6 hours (3.1 ± 1.2 vs 5.2 ± 1.4; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean time to first analgesic request was prolonged in the Block Group (312 ± 56 min) compared to Control (182 ± 48 min). Total 24-hour opioid requirement was reduced by approximately 40%. Incidence of urinary retention and nausea/vomiting was similar between groups. No local anaesthetic toxicity or block-related complications occurred.<i> Conclusion: </i>Adding a perineal block to spinal anaesthesia significantly enhances postoperative pain control, delays the need for rescue analgesia, and lowers opioid consumption without added risk. This combined approach may be recommended as an effective, safe analgesic technique after haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Medicine Research
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.20261501.11
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study Between Adjuvant Perineal Block and Spinal Anaesthesia Alone for Post-haemorrhoidectomy Pain Control

M K M Foisal Quader Chowdhury, Tahira Benzir, Tazdina Hoque Khan
Clinical Medicine Research
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

Comparative Study Between Adjuvant Perineal Block and Spinal Anaesthesia Alone for Post-haemorrhoidectomy Pain Control

M K M Foisal Quader Chowdhury, Tahira Benzir, Tazdina Hoque Khan
article en

Abstract

<i>Background: </i>Severe postoperative pain is common after haemorrhoidectomy and can delay recovery and discharge. While spinal anaesthesia provides good intraoperative analgesia, its postoperative effect is short-lived. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of an adjuvant perineal block combined with spinal anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia alone for postoperative pain control. <i>Methods:</i> In this randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 68 patients (ASA I–III) scheduled for elective open haemorrhoidectomy were assigned into two groups:<i> </i>Group A (Block Group): spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine followed by posterior perineal block using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine;<i> </i>Group B (Control Group): spinal anaesthesia alone.<i> </i>Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2, 12, 24 and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included time to first rescue analgesic, total opioid consumption, urinary retention, nausea/vomiting, and patient satisfaction.<i> Results: </i>Patients in Group A had significantly lower mean VAS scores at all postoperative intervals, with the greatest difference at 6 hours (3.1 ± 1.2 vs 5.2 ± 1.4; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean time to first analgesic request was prolonged in the Block Group (312 ± 56 min) compared to Control (182 ± 48 min). Total 24-hour opioid requirement was reduced by approximately 40%. Incidence of urinary retention and nausea/vomiting was similar between groups. No local anaesthetic toxicity or block-related complications occurred.<i> Conclusion: </i>Adding a perineal block to spinal anaesthesia significantly enhances postoperative pain control, delays the need for rescue analgesia, and lowers opioid consumption without added risk. This combined approach may be recommended as an effective, safe analgesic technique after haemorrhoidectomy.

Clinical Medicine ResearchVol. 15(1)
Chittagong Medical College (BD), Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.