New and Old Elites Across the Carpathians. General Averescu’s Prefects in Transylvania (1920–1921, 1926–1927)

Abstract This paper examines the recruitment strategies and profiles of prefects appointed in Transylvania (including Banat, Partium, and Maramureș) during General Alexandru Averescu’s second and third governments (1920–1921; 1926–1927). Combining appointment decrees published in the Monitorul Oficial with prosopographic and biographical sources, it traces how political change, party organization, and center– periphery dynamics shaped selections, resignations, and delegations. Quantitative evidence suggests that a large majority of prefects were locally born and legally trained, while the presence of appointees from the Old Kingdom in 1920–1921 diminished markedly by 1926–1927. The analysis underscores the prefect’s pivotal electoral role and shows how Averescu’s allies—especially in 1926—balanced local legitimacy with central control. It also situates recruitment patterns within broader political realignments and debates over administrative centralization and “Romanianisation.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis Series Historica
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/sucsh-2025-0007
Primary Topic
Central European national history
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New and Old Elites Across the Carpathians. General Averescu’s Prefects in Transylvania (1920–1921, 1926–1927)

Andrei Florin Sora
Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis Series Historica
Central European national history
article

New and Old Elites Across the Carpathians. General Averescu’s Prefects in Transylvania (1920–1921, 1926–1927)

Andrei Florin Sora
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the recruitment strategies and profiles of prefects appointed in Transylvania (including Banat, Partium, and Maramureș) during General Alexandru Averescu’s second and third governments (1920–1921; 1926–1927). Combining appointment decrees published in the Monitorul Oficial with prosopographic and biographical sources, it traces how political change, party organization, and center– periphery dynamics shaped selections, resignations, and delegations. Quantitative evidence suggests that a large majority of prefects were locally born and legally trained, while the presence of appointees from the Old Kingdom in 1920–1921 diminished markedly by 1926–1927. The analysis underscores the prefect’s pivotal electoral role and shows how Averescu’s allies—especially in 1926—balanced local legitimacy with central control. It also situates recruitment patterns within broader political realignments and debates over administrative centralization and “Romanianisation.”

Studia Universitatis Cibiniensis Series HistoricaVol. 22(1)
Czech Academy of Sciences, Masaryk Institute and Archives (CZ)
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Central European national history
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.