Prioritizing the Health of Underserved Communities in Prenatal Genetics

Abstract: Prenatal cell-free genetic screening (cfDNA) for fetal chromosomal conditions, including aneuploidy and microdeletion syndromes, is increasingly offered in diverse patient populations and clinical settings, including in safety-net clinics and other public health settings. Companies testing for cfDNA have argued for first-tier cfDNA by state Medicaid programs, arguing that differences in coverage of these screens between public and private insurance constitute a health disparity. We contend that this framing is unhelpful considering the ongoing maternal and perinatal health crisis affecting low-income families and existing data on the primary drivers of disparate pregnancy outcomes. cfDNA technology has the potential for a significant impact on public health and prenatal health disparities, if panels were less expensive and addressed the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Finally, we examine the role of prenatal genetics in public health and discuss promising prenatal technologies that could help address adverse pregnancy outcomes disproportionately affecting minoritized and underserved populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2026.a982975
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing the Health of Underserved Communities in Prenatal Genetics

Marsha Michie, Kirsten A. Riggan, Jane Q. Yap, Katie Stoll et al.
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Prioritizing the Health of Underserved Communities in Prenatal Genetics

Marsha Michie, Kirsten A. Riggan, Jane Q. Yap, Katie Stoll, Stephanie Meredith, Megan A. Allyse
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Prenatal cell-free genetic screening (cfDNA) for fetal chromosomal conditions, including aneuploidy and microdeletion syndromes, is increasingly offered in diverse patient populations and clinical settings, including in safety-net clinics and other public health settings. Companies testing for cfDNA have argued for first-tier cfDNA by state Medicaid programs, arguing that differences in coverage of these screens between public and private insurance constitute a health disparity. We contend that this framing is unhelpful considering the ongoing maternal and perinatal health crisis affecting low-income families and existing data on the primary drivers of disparate pregnancy outcomes. cfDNA technology has the potential for a significant impact on public health and prenatal health disparities, if panels were less expensive and addressed the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Finally, we examine the role of prenatal genetics in public health and discuss promising prenatal technologies that could help address adverse pregnancy outcomes disproportionately affecting minoritized and underserved populations.

Journal of Health Care for the Poor and UnderservedVol. 37(1)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prioritizing the Health of Underserved Communities in Prenatal Genetics — Marsha Michie, Kirsten A. Riggan, et al. · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS