Reducing waste from single-use procedure packs in hospitals: A scoping review

Single-use items in pre-packaged procedure packs are disposed of after opening, regardless of whether they were used. We aimed to synthesise published evidence on evaluations of hospital-relevant interventions or comparisons targeting waste from procedure packs. We included intervention and aetiological observational studies, excluding purely descriptive studies, secondary studies and conference abstracts. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus from inception to 7 May 2024 and undertook forward and backward citation searches of included records. Of 1074 records retrieved, 14 studies met inclusion criteria. Eight were before-after quality improvement studies, five were comparative life cycle assessments and one was an audit. Studies reported on reductions in items in the pack (<i>n</i> = 8), change from single-use to reusable items (<i>n</i> = 3) and comparisons between different packs (<i>n</i> = 2) or individually packed items and packs (<i>n</i> = 1). Twelve studies reported on financial and waste impacts, six on environmental impacts and three on staff/patient impacts. Studies reported financial savings up to US$49.43 for reduced item packs and up to £7.22 for reusable packs versus single-use packs. Pack size and weight can often be much reduced, leading to less resource use and up to 2042g reduction in waste/pack and up to 860g less CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) emissions. Switching instruments in packs from single-use to reusable reduced emissions by up to 90% where local energy was not predominantly from fossil fuels. No negative impacts on staff or patient outcomes were reported. Initiatives to reduce waste from single-use procedure packs may result in significant financial, resource use and CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions savings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x251374693
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing waste from single-use procedure packs in hospitals: A scoping review

Luise Kazda, K Pickles, Philomena Colagiuri, Alexandra R Seville et al.
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Reducing waste from single-use procedure packs in hospitals: A scoping review

Luise Kazda, K Pickles, Philomena Colagiuri, Alexandra R Seville, Katy JL Bell, Scott McAlister
article en

Abstract

Single-use items in pre-packaged procedure packs are disposed of after opening, regardless of whether they were used. We aimed to synthesise published evidence on evaluations of hospital-relevant interventions or comparisons targeting waste from procedure packs. We included intervention and aetiological observational studies, excluding purely descriptive studies, secondary studies and conference abstracts. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus from inception to 7 May 2024 and undertook forward and backward citation searches of included records. Of 1074 records retrieved, 14 studies met inclusion criteria. Eight were before-after quality improvement studies, five were comparative life cycle assessments and one was an audit. Studies reported on reductions in items in the pack (<i>n</i> = 8), change from single-use to reusable items (<i>n</i> = 3) and comparisons between different packs (<i>n</i> = 2) or individually packed items and packs (<i>n</i> = 1). Twelve studies reported on financial and waste impacts, six on environmental impacts and three on staff/patient impacts. Studies reported financial savings up to US$49.43 for reduced item packs and up to £7.22 for reusable packs versus single-use packs. Pack size and weight can often be much reduced, leading to less resource use and up to 2042g reduction in waste/pack and up to 860g less CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) emissions. Switching instruments in packs from single-use to reusable reduced emissions by up to 90% where local energy was not predominantly from fossil fuels. No negative impacts on staff or patient outcomes were reported. Initiatives to reduce waste from single-use procedure packs may result in significant financial, resource use and CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions savings.

Anaesthesia and Intensive CareVol. 54(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), New South Wales Department of Health (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.