Comparison Between Natural Products and Chlorhexidine in Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

<b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of natural products compared with chlorhexidine (CHX) as adjuncts to non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) in patients with periodontitis. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251133219). Electronic searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2020 and 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients with periodontitis treated with NSPT, comparing CHX-based products with natural formulations (mouthwashes, gels, irrigants, or dentifrices). Data extraction included product type, concentration, mode of application, follow-up duration, and primary periodontal outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Results: Thirteen randomized controlled clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Natural products such as <i>Curcuma longa</i>, <i>Morus alba</i>, <i>Spirulina platensis</i>, <i>Propolis</i>, <i>Triphala</i>, and <i>Lycium barbarum</i> demonstrated improvements in clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing pocket depth (PPD) comparable to those obtained with CHX, along with significant reductions in bleeding on probing (BoP) and plaque index (PI). Probiotic- and ozone-based treatments also showed favorable clinical outcomes, with faster healing and fewer adverse effects, such as tooth staining and taste alteration. Follow-up periods ranged from 14 days to 3 months. <b>Conclusions:</b> Natural products appear to be safe and effective alternatives to CHX when used as adjuncts to non-surgical periodontal therapy, providing comparable clinical benefits with a lower incidence of side effects. Nevertheless, further large-scale, long-term randomized trials are needed to standardize formulations and concentrations and to confirm the durability of these clinical effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14020110
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Between Natural Products and Chlorhexidine in Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

Valentino Natoli, Maurizio Pascadopoli, Matteo Pellegrini, Andrea Butera et al.
Dentistry Journal
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Comparison Between Natural Products and Chlorhexidine in Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

Valentino Natoli, Maurizio Pascadopoli, Matteo Pellegrini, Andrea Butera, Andrea Scribante, Valentina Poma
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of natural products compared with chlorhexidine (CHX) as adjuncts to non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) in patients with periodontitis. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251133219). Electronic searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2020 and 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients with periodontitis treated with NSPT, comparing CHX-based products with natural formulations (mouthwashes, gels, irrigants, or dentifrices). Data extraction included product type, concentration, mode of application, follow-up duration, and primary periodontal outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Results: Thirteen randomized controlled clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Natural products such as <i>Curcuma longa</i>, <i>Morus alba</i>, <i>Spirulina platensis</i>, <i>Propolis</i>, <i>Triphala</i>, and <i>Lycium barbarum</i> demonstrated improvements in clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing pocket depth (PPD) comparable to those obtained with CHX, along with significant reductions in bleeding on probing (BoP) and plaque index (PI). Probiotic- and ozone-based treatments also showed favorable clinical outcomes, with faster healing and fewer adverse effects, such as tooth staining and taste alteration. Follow-up periods ranged from 14 days to 3 months. <b>Conclusions:</b> Natural products appear to be safe and effective alternatives to CHX when used as adjuncts to non-surgical periodontal therapy, providing comparable clinical benefits with a lower incidence of side effects. Nevertheless, further large-scale, long-term randomized trials are needed to standardize formulations and concentrations and to confirm the durability of these clinical effects.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(2)
University of Pavia (IT), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.