Positive predictive value metrics for multicancer detection tests

IntroductionMulticancer detection (MCD) tests generally target selected cancer sites, but may also have some detection ability at other sites; they additionally typically give a predicted cancer signal origin (CSO) for positive tests. Positive predictive value (PPV) is a widely used metric assessing performance of single-cancer screening tests. The aim here was to define PPVs in a number of ways in the MCD context, create a prototypical MCD test, and show the qualitative and quantitative properties of these PPV metrics.MethodsPPVs were defined based on which subjects were included in the numerator and denominator. PPV<sub>ALL</sub>, PPV<sub>T</sub>, and PPV<sub>CSO</sub> each have as denominator all subjects with positive screens, and as numerators all subjects with any cancer diagnosis, diagnosis at any targeted site, and diagnosis at the predicted CSO site, respectively. Predicted CSO site-specific PPVs were defined similarly, except with denominator subjects with a given cancer site as predicted CSO. MCD performance data taken from a case-control study and population incidence rates were used to determine sensitivity, specificity, CSO accuracy, and cancer prevalence values of a prototypical MCD test for which PPV were calculated. A range of sensitivity rates for nontargeted cancer sites were assessed.ResultsPPV<sub>ALL</sub> increased and PPV<sub>T</sub> decreased as sensitivity for nontargeted sites increased. Predicted site-specific PPVs depended primarily on cancer site CSO accuracy, not on site population prevalence.ConclusionsPPVs can be defined in multiple ways for MCD tests. Their usefulness depends on the clinical context. Companies offering MCD tests can consider discussing the clinical usefulness of various PPVs with clinicians to decide what metrics to include on test reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Screening
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413261421478
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Positive predictive value metrics for multicancer detection tests

Christos Patriotis, Paul F Pinsky, Wendy S Rubinstein, Elyse M LeeVan
Journal of Medical Screening
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Positive predictive value metrics for multicancer detection tests

Christos Patriotis, Paul F Pinsky, Wendy S Rubinstein, Elyse M LeeVan
article en

Abstract

IntroductionMulticancer detection (MCD) tests generally target selected cancer sites, but may also have some detection ability at other sites; they additionally typically give a predicted cancer signal origin (CSO) for positive tests. Positive predictive value (PPV) is a widely used metric assessing performance of single-cancer screening tests. The aim here was to define PPVs in a number of ways in the MCD context, create a prototypical MCD test, and show the qualitative and quantitative properties of these PPV metrics.MethodsPPVs were defined based on which subjects were included in the numerator and denominator. PPV<sub>ALL</sub>, PPV<sub>T</sub>, and PPV<sub>CSO</sub> each have as denominator all subjects with positive screens, and as numerators all subjects with any cancer diagnosis, diagnosis at any targeted site, and diagnosis at the predicted CSO site, respectively. Predicted CSO site-specific PPVs were defined similarly, except with denominator subjects with a given cancer site as predicted CSO. MCD performance data taken from a case-control study and population incidence rates were used to determine sensitivity, specificity, CSO accuracy, and cancer prevalence values of a prototypical MCD test for which PPV were calculated. A range of sensitivity rates for nontargeted cancer sites were assessed.ResultsPPV<sub>ALL</sub> increased and PPV<sub>T</sub> decreased as sensitivity for nontargeted sites increased. Predicted site-specific PPVs depended primarily on cancer site CSO accuracy, not on site population prevalence.ConclusionsPPVs can be defined in multiple ways for MCD tests. Their usefulness depends on the clinical context. Companies offering MCD tests can consider discussing the clinical usefulness of various PPVs with clinicians to decide what metrics to include on test reports.

Journal of Medical Screening
National Cancer Institute (MY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.