Impact of Medicaid Expansion on State-Level Medicaid Reimbursement for Orthodontia in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cost Analysis

<i>Objective</i>Examine state-level Medicaid reimbursement rates after Medicaid expansion for Phase I and II orthodontia relevant to patients with cleft lip and palate.<i>Design</i>Cross-sectional study of publicly available 2024 state Medicaid reimbursement rates associated with Phase I and II orthodontia. One-Way ANOVA and independent t-tests compared regional and Medicaid expansion groups.<i>Setting</i>National sample of Medicaid reimbursement fee schedules.<i>Patients</i>Fifty US states, including DC, utilizing fee-for-service reimbursement for Medicaid enrollees.<i>Main Outcome Measure(s)</i>Reimbursement Rates for CPT Code D8020 (Phase I: Limited Orthodontia, Transitional Dentition) and D8080 (Phase II: Comprehensive Orthodontia, Adolescent Dentition) were compared between regions and by Medicaid expansion status.<i>Results</i>Ten states did not adopt Medicaid Expansion (19.6%: AL, FL, GA, KS, MS, SC, TN, TX, WI, and WY). Coverage of Phase I care was low overall (58.5% of expanded and 55.6% of non-expanded states), with average reimbursement of $1080.13. More states offered Phase II coverage (87.8% of expanded and 77.8% of non-expanded states). Phase II reimbursement was higher in expansion states ($2596.73 ± $2252.59 vs non-expansion: $1266.78 ± $314.19; <i>P</i> = .001). The South trended toward higher reimbursement for Phase II ($3224.95; <i>P</i> = .093), followed by the West ($2902.88 ± 1327.40 vs $1413.26-$1699.10).<i>Conclusions</i>Provider reimbursement influences access to orthodontia. Although Medicaid expansion aims to improve access for low-income families, gaps in orthodontic coverage persist. Despite higher Phase II reimbursement in Southern and expansion states, inadequate Phase I coverage and low reimbursement schedules limit provider participation, leaving low-income patients with clefts at risk for delayed or absent orthodontia and thus suboptimal outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261421052
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Medicaid Expansion on State-Level Medicaid Reimbursement for Orthodontia in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cost Analysis

Ashlie A. Elver, Kendall C. Pitre, Ronald Rae McCall, Laura S Humphries et al.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Impact of Medicaid Expansion on State-Level Medicaid Reimbursement for Orthodontia in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cost Analysis

Ashlie A. Elver, Kendall C. Pitre, Ronald Rae McCall, Laura S Humphries, Ian C Hoppe
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>Examine state-level Medicaid reimbursement rates after Medicaid expansion for Phase I and II orthodontia relevant to patients with cleft lip and palate.<i>Design</i>Cross-sectional study of publicly available 2024 state Medicaid reimbursement rates associated with Phase I and II orthodontia. One-Way ANOVA and independent t-tests compared regional and Medicaid expansion groups.<i>Setting</i>National sample of Medicaid reimbursement fee schedules.<i>Patients</i>Fifty US states, including DC, utilizing fee-for-service reimbursement for Medicaid enrollees.<i>Main Outcome Measure(s)</i>Reimbursement Rates for CPT Code D8020 (Phase I: Limited Orthodontia, Transitional Dentition) and D8080 (Phase II: Comprehensive Orthodontia, Adolescent Dentition) were compared between regions and by Medicaid expansion status.<i>Results</i>Ten states did not adopt Medicaid Expansion (19.6%: AL, FL, GA, KS, MS, SC, TN, TX, WI, and WY). Coverage of Phase I care was low overall (58.5% of expanded and 55.6% of non-expanded states), with average reimbursement of $1080.13. More states offered Phase II coverage (87.8% of expanded and 77.8% of non-expanded states). Phase II reimbursement was higher in expansion states ($2596.73 ± $2252.59 vs non-expansion: $1266.78 ± $314.19; <i>P</i> = .001). The South trended toward higher reimbursement for Phase II ($3224.95; <i>P</i> = .093), followed by the West ($2902.88 ± 1327.40 vs $1413.26-$1699.10).<i>Conclusions</i>Provider reimbursement influences access to orthodontia. Although Medicaid expansion aims to improve access for low-income families, gaps in orthodontic coverage persist. Despite higher Phase II reimbursement in Southern and expansion states, inadequate Phase I coverage and low reimbursement schedules limit provider participation, leaving low-income patients with clefts at risk for delayed or absent orthodontia and thus suboptimal outcomes.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial JournalVol. 63(3)
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.