Foreign Language Writing Emotions and Linguistic Complexity in Argumentative Writing: A Latent Profile Analysis

ABSTRACT Recent research into emotion‐achievement links has increasingly recognized the necessity of analyzing these relationships at a skill‐specific level. However, this body of work remains dominated by variable‐centered approaches, which overlook how emotions interact with one another to shape these skills. Focusing on the second language (L2) writing domain, this study adopted a person‐centered approach to explore the relationship between foreign language writing emotions (i.e., enjoyment and boredom, with the former comprising private and social dimensions) and linguistic complexity in argumentative writing produced by Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Using latent profile analysis, we identified three distinct emotional profiles: the Highly Positive Group (HPG), the Moderately Positive Group (MPG), and the Slightly Negative Group (SNG). Analysis of these profiles revealed that the inverse relationship between internally‐driven private enjoyment and boredom was stronger than that between interpersonally‐constructed social enjoyment and boredom. The HPG and the MPG, characterized by net positive emotions, significantly outperformed the SNG in several complexity measures that showed greater degrees of variation. The study contributes to L2 writing research by applying person‐centered emotional profiling and highlighting two key pedagogical insights: the value of fostering internally driven enjoyment and the need to embrace emotional complexity in writing instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70125
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foreign Language Writing Emotions and Linguistic Complexity in Argumentative Writing: A Latent Profile Analysis

Wei Xiaobao, Zhang Xiaomeng
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Foreign Language Writing Emotions and Linguistic Complexity in Argumentative Writing: A Latent Profile Analysis

Wei Xiaobao, Zhang Xiaomeng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent research into emotion‐achievement links has increasingly recognized the necessity of analyzing these relationships at a skill‐specific level. However, this body of work remains dominated by variable‐centered approaches, which overlook how emotions interact with one another to shape these skills. Focusing on the second language (L2) writing domain, this study adopted a person‐centered approach to explore the relationship between foreign language writing emotions (i.e., enjoyment and boredom, with the former comprising private and social dimensions) and linguistic complexity in argumentative writing produced by Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Using latent profile analysis, we identified three distinct emotional profiles: the Highly Positive Group (HPG), the Moderately Positive Group (MPG), and the Slightly Negative Group (SNG). Analysis of these profiles revealed that the inverse relationship between internally‐driven private enjoyment and boredom was stronger than that between interpersonally‐constructed social enjoyment and boredom. The HPG and the MPG, characterized by net positive emotions, significantly outperformed the SNG in several complexity measures that showed greater degrees of variation. The study contributes to L2 writing research by applying person‐centered emotional profiling and highlighting two key pedagogical insights: the value of fostering internally driven enjoyment and the need to embrace emotional complexity in writing instruction.

International Journal of Applied Linguistics
East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.