Electrification of gasification-based chemical recycling – A techno-economic assessment

• Electrification of waste gasification can reduce carbon emissions by 63 up to 99% • Plasma-assisted gasification can be more profitable than non-electrified gasification. • Plasma-assisted gasification is more cost-efficient than hydrogen integration. • Levelized production costs between 515 and 971€ per ton methanol are calculated. • The key parameter is the availability of affordable renewable electricity. Gasification-based chemical recycling can be one of the key technologies to close the carbon loop on non-recyclable plastic waste as well as other challenging waste streams in order to reduce emissions and provide carbon to the chemical industry. However, gasification process chains exhibit limited carbon recovery to products due to intrinsic CO 2 production. This can be counteracted by electrification, either by integration of plasma into the gasification or by integration of electrolytic hydrogen into the process chain. For a representative plastic waste sorting residue stream, these electrification pathways are compared to non-electrified gasification and assessed from a techno-economic perspective based on thermodynamic modeling. The results show that electrification has the potential to increase carbon recovered to the main product by 30 to 47%pts., with almost full recovery possible for hydrogen. Economically, plasma gasification is favorable, showing 20% higher net present value, while a 50% reduction in net present value was identified for hydrogen, both in comparison to the non-electrified reference case. Additionally, plasma gasification was found to have the lowest levelized cost of production of around 635 €/t of methanol of all electrified cases. As a key influencing parameter, cost of electricity is identified. These findings indicate that plasma integration into waste gasification process chains is a promising pathway for future low-emission waste management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121181
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrification of gasification-based chemical recycling – A techno-economic assessment

Martin Gräbner, Florian Keller
Energy Conversion and Management
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Electrification of gasification-based chemical recycling – A techno-economic assessment

Martin Gräbner, Florian Keller
article en

Abstract

• Electrification of waste gasification can reduce carbon emissions by 63 up to 99% • Plasma-assisted gasification can be more profitable than non-electrified gasification. • Plasma-assisted gasification is more cost-efficient than hydrogen integration. • Levelized production costs between 515 and 971€ per ton methanol are calculated. • The key parameter is the availability of affordable renewable electricity. Gasification-based chemical recycling can be one of the key technologies to close the carbon loop on non-recyclable plastic waste as well as other challenging waste streams in order to reduce emissions and provide carbon to the chemical industry. However, gasification process chains exhibit limited carbon recovery to products due to intrinsic CO 2 production. This can be counteracted by electrification, either by integration of plasma into the gasification or by integration of electrolytic hydrogen into the process chain. For a representative plastic waste sorting residue stream, these electrification pathways are compared to non-electrified gasification and assessed from a techno-economic perspective based on thermodynamic modeling. The results show that electrification has the potential to increase carbon recovered to the main product by 30 to 47%pts., with almost full recovery possible for hydrogen. Economically, plasma gasification is favorable, showing 20% higher net present value, while a 50% reduction in net present value was identified for hydrogen, both in comparison to the non-electrified reference case. Additionally, plasma gasification was found to have the lowest levelized cost of production of around 635 €/t of methanol of all electrified cases. As a key influencing parameter, cost of electricity is identified. These findings indicate that plasma integration into waste gasification process chains is a promising pathway for future low-emission waste management.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 353
Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems (DE), TU Bergakademie Freiberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Electrification of gasification-based chemical recycling – A techno-economic assessment — Martin Gräbner, Florian Keller · Energy Conversion and Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS