Breaking bad news: self-assessment, attitude, and preferences of medical students in GCC countries

Breaking bad news (BBN) is an essential but challenging physician competency. Inadequate preparation for this task is linked to increased stress for both patients and clinicians, as well as poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) medical students’ self-perceived knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and educational preferences toward BBN to identify specific curriculum gaps and inform future training requirements. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted using a semi-structured online questionnaire distributed to medical students from governmental and private medical schools across six GCC countries. The survey collected data on demographics, BBN knowledge, BBN experiences, self-rated confidence, attitudes, and preferred learning modalities. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Chi-square tests were used to assess associations between categorical variables, and independent sample t-tests were used to compare knowledge levels with mean attitude scores. A total of 365 students participated. While 62.2% demonstrated good theoretical knowledge about BBN, only 38.6% reported confidence in their general ability to perform it. Half of the participants (49.9%) expressed difficulty in showing empathy, and 34.5% were concerned about explaining diagnoses. Only 17.3% had personally delivered bad news. A significant dissociation was found between the type of exposure and its impact: students who witnessed BBN found it educational (73.1%, p < 0.001), whereas those who personally delivered bad news associated the experience with significant stress (68.7%, p < 0.001). Better theoretical knowledge was significantly associated with a more positive attitude (p = 0.003). Participants expressed a strong preference for active, experiential learning, with 47.7% favoring role-playing with simulated patients and 33.2% preferring exercises with a psychologist. This study reveals a marked gap between theoretical knowledge and practical confidence among GCC medical students. While passive observation is perceived as educational, unguided exposure to delivering bad news is associated with heightened stress. GCC medical curricula should incorporate structured, longitudinal training that prioritizes simulation-based practice and reflective debriefing. These interventions are necessary to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice, ensuring students are competent and psychologically prepared for this professional responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08790-y
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking bad news: self-assessment, attitude, and preferences of medical students in GCC countries

Shahad Abdullah Alkiyumi, Mohammed Shehata, Amer Almarabheh, Marah Abdulhadi Alhamoud et al.
BMC Medical Education
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Breaking bad news: self-assessment, attitude, and preferences of medical students in GCC countries

Shahad Abdullah Alkiyumi, Mohammed Shehata, Amer Almarabheh, Marah Abdulhadi Alhamoud, Shahad Said Alsharji, Manar Matar Alhajooj, Hany Atwa, Ghadeer Al-Tobi, Samar Ahmed, Bayan Almamari
article en

Abstract

Breaking bad news (BBN) is an essential but challenging physician competency. Inadequate preparation for this task is linked to increased stress for both patients and clinicians, as well as poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) medical students’ self-perceived knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and educational preferences toward BBN to identify specific curriculum gaps and inform future training requirements. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted using a semi-structured online questionnaire distributed to medical students from governmental and private medical schools across six GCC countries. The survey collected data on demographics, BBN knowledge, BBN experiences, self-rated confidence, attitudes, and preferred learning modalities. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Chi-square tests were used to assess associations between categorical variables, and independent sample t-tests were used to compare knowledge levels with mean attitude scores. A total of 365 students participated. While 62.2% demonstrated good theoretical knowledge about BBN, only 38.6% reported confidence in their general ability to perform it. Half of the participants (49.9%) expressed difficulty in showing empathy, and 34.5% were concerned about explaining diagnoses. Only 17.3% had personally delivered bad news. A significant dissociation was found between the type of exposure and its impact: students who witnessed BBN found it educational (73.1%, p < 0.001), whereas those who personally delivered bad news associated the experience with significant stress (68.7%, p < 0.001). Better theoretical knowledge was significantly associated with a more positive attitude (p = 0.003). Participants expressed a strong preference for active, experiential learning, with 47.7% favoring role-playing with simulated patients and 33.2% preferring exercises with a psychologist. This study reveals a marked gap between theoretical knowledge and practical confidence among GCC medical students. While passive observation is perceived as educational, unguided exposure to delivering bad news is associated with heightened stress. GCC medical curricula should incorporate structured, longitudinal training that prioritizes simulation-based practice and reflective debriefing. These interventions are necessary to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice, ensuring students are competent and psychologically prepared for this professional responsibility.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Suez Canal University (EG), Cairo University (EG), Oman Medical College (OM), King Fahd Medical City (SA), Ministry of Health (SA), Arabian Gulf University (BH)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.