Lost in Transmission: The Trace of Meaning from Tzimtzum to Différance

Derrida’s notion of différance and the concept of tzimtzum in the Lurianic Kabbalah share intriguing overlaps in their perspectives on absence as a precondition for meaning. The concept of tzimtzum in Etz Chaim explains the act of creation through divine contraction, a paradoxical withdrawal of the infinite (the Ein Sof) that creates the space for differentiation, structure, and thereby meaning to emerge. Derrida’s concept of différance involving deferral and difference illustrates how meaning is never fully present but always mediated by traces, gaps, and absences. Derrida’s radical openness in interpretation and the radically fixed framework that builds the mystical premise appear to create a juxtaposing paradigm. What kind of interpretative or traditional reactions generate these foundation-shattering premises in presence-centric systems?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Philologica
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47745/ausp-2025-0029
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in Transmission: The Trace of Meaning from Tzimtzum to Différance

Sabina Avram
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Philologica
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

Lost in Transmission: The Trace of Meaning from Tzimtzum to Différance

Sabina Avram
article en

Abstract

Derrida’s notion of différance and the concept of tzimtzum in the Lurianic Kabbalah share intriguing overlaps in their perspectives on absence as a precondition for meaning. The concept of tzimtzum in Etz Chaim explains the act of creation through divine contraction, a paradoxical withdrawal of the infinite (the Ein Sof) that creates the space for differentiation, structure, and thereby meaning to emerge. Derrida’s concept of différance involving deferral and difference illustrates how meaning is never fully present but always mediated by traces, gaps, and absences. Derrida’s radical openness in interpretation and the radically fixed framework that builds the mystical premise appear to create a juxtaposing paradigm. What kind of interpretative or traditional reactions generate these foundation-shattering premises in presence-centric systems?

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae PhilologicaVol. 17(3)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.