“Carrots or Sticks”? The Impact of Green Subsidies and Environmental Regulations on the Green Production Behavior and Synergistic Effects of Beef Cattle Breeders: An Empirical Study Based on China

In advancing the green transformation of the livestock industry, whether “carrots” or “sticks” prove more effective remains to be further tested. Drawing on micro-level survey data from 273 beef cattle farmers in Yunnan Province, China, this study employs farmers’ subjective evaluations of green subsidies and environmental regulation intensity to characterize corresponding policy instruments. An ordered Probit model is used to analyze the impact and underlying mechanisms of green subsidies and environmental regulations on farmers’ green production behaviors. Results indicate: (1) Both green subsidies and environmental regulations promote green production practices among beef cattle farmers, with green subsidies demonstrating stronger effects that remain robust across a series of stability tests. (2) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that both policy instruments positively influence various types of green production behaviors, with the most significant effect observed on manure resource utilization. This effect is stronger among risk-preferring farmers and those participating in cooperatives. Furthermore, green subsidies significantly promote green production behaviors among small and medium-sized farmers, while environmental regulations enhance green production behaviors across all farmer sizes, with larger farmers experiencing stronger effects. (3) Mechanism analysis indicates that green subsidies and environmental regulations primarily promote green production practices by encouraging farmers to participate in green training, build green facilities, and enhance their green awareness. (4) Further analysis reveals no synergistic effects between green subsidies and environmental regulations. The research conclusion of this study can provide a reference for optimizing policy tool combinations in regions with similar beef cattle farming structures and regional characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041945
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Carrots or Sticks”? The Impact of Green Subsidies and Environmental Regulations on the Green Production Behavior and Synergistic Effects of Beef Cattle Breeders: An Empirical Study Based on China

Junlong Ma, Shiwei Li, Siyuan Qi
Sustainability
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

“Carrots or Sticks”? The Impact of Green Subsidies and Environmental Regulations on the Green Production Behavior and Synergistic Effects of Beef Cattle Breeders: An Empirical Study Based on China

Junlong Ma, Shiwei Li, Siyuan Qi
article en

Abstract

In advancing the green transformation of the livestock industry, whether “carrots” or “sticks” prove more effective remains to be further tested. Drawing on micro-level survey data from 273 beef cattle farmers in Yunnan Province, China, this study employs farmers’ subjective evaluations of green subsidies and environmental regulation intensity to characterize corresponding policy instruments. An ordered Probit model is used to analyze the impact and underlying mechanisms of green subsidies and environmental regulations on farmers’ green production behaviors. Results indicate: (1) Both green subsidies and environmental regulations promote green production practices among beef cattle farmers, with green subsidies demonstrating stronger effects that remain robust across a series of stability tests. (2) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that both policy instruments positively influence various types of green production behaviors, with the most significant effect observed on manure resource utilization. This effect is stronger among risk-preferring farmers and those participating in cooperatives. Furthermore, green subsidies significantly promote green production behaviors among small and medium-sized farmers, while environmental regulations enhance green production behaviors across all farmer sizes, with larger farmers experiencing stronger effects. (3) Mechanism analysis indicates that green subsidies and environmental regulations primarily promote green production practices by encouraging farmers to participate in green training, build green facilities, and enhance their green awareness. (4) Further analysis reveals no synergistic effects between green subsidies and environmental regulations. The research conclusion of this study can provide a reference for optimizing policy tool combinations in regions with similar beef cattle farming structures and regional characteristics.

SustainabilityVol. 18(4)
Sichuan Agricultural University (CN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Carrots or Sticks”? The Impact of Green Subsidies and Environmental Regulations on the Green Production Behavior and Synergistic Effects of Beef Cattle Breeders: An Empirical Study Based on China — Junlong Ma, Shiwei Li, et al. · Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS